Laserfiche WebLink
City Planner Anderson stated that to the west there looks to be a very similar layout with lots that <br />have direct access onto CR 64, and to the east there is another similar scenario. He stated that he <br />does understand the safety concerns but as proposed this would fit with what exists in the area. <br />Commissioner Anderson commented that the Commission has been working hard to put safety <br />first and minimize the chance of accidents on the busy roads when considering new developments. <br />He recognized that the lots to the east and west exist and have been there, but they should also <br />focus on safety. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he pulled up old numbers from the Highway Department <br />and that stretch of road has about 3,400 daily vehicles whereas Armstrong has 6,000. He <br />commented that it is not the busiest of the County roads in Ramsey. He noted that the horrible <br />corner on CR 5 has a count of 9,000. <br />Commissioner Peters asked if the property is also for sale on the Nowthen side of the road. It was <br />confirmed that property has been sold. He noted that there could then be more houses going in. <br />He stated that he traverses that road daily and you take caution during the winter months. He <br />stated that in the future there would most likely be action by the County to improve the road and <br />perhaps add turn lanes. <br />Chairperson Gengler invited the developer to address the Commission. <br />Eric Lewth, Landform, stated that he was present in representation of the applicants. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked how open the applicant is to working to develop an alternative to <br />13 driveways. <br />Mr. Lewth stated that the MnDOT access management manual recommends a minimum spacing <br />of 100 feet between driveways on a 55 mile per hour road. He stated that they are proposing an <br />average of 200 feet between driveways which is double that recommendation. He stated that they <br />are happy to entertain other suggestions but would like to submit a compliant application without <br />variances. He stated that minimum lot frontage of 200 feet for rural properties is based off the <br />MnDOT recommendation that has not changed for the last 50 years. <br />Commissioner Hunt referenced the ideas of shifting five or ten feet on the lot line to accommodate <br />the driveway and asked the thoughts of the applicant. <br />Mr. Lewth noted a no disturb buffer from the watershed. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization <br />(LRRWMO) requires that the member cities require a 16.5-foot wetland setback. <br />Mr. Lewth confirmed that they could look at shifting a bit, but it would be difficult to avoid 100 <br />percent of the buffer. He stated that if there is a five-foot setback for a driveway, they could move <br />that and it would impact the buffer and not the wetland itself, but also acknowledged the potential <br />that the setback could be reduced to zero per the previous discussion. <br />Planning Commission/ October 24, 2024 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />