My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/21/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2024
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/21/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:37:41 PM
Creation date
11/15/2024 3:32:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/21/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy used the scenario that two property owners both chose to place their <br />driveways at the lot line and asked how vehicles just a few inches apart would open their doors. <br />He stated that people also say they move to Ramsey because of the rural character and open space <br />and therefore questions this concept. <br />Commissioner Hunt asked how this would compare to other cities in the county, as his quick search <br />showed three to five feet. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that typically the driveway setback is five to ten feet, and Coon <br />Rapids allows zero. He stated that the bigger, inner city metro area tends to have less noting <br />Richfield at zero, and the more suburban communities tend to use five feet. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked the typical lot width for a zero -driveway setback. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that some of the older Coon Rapids lots are 50 feet wide. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that when he lived in Richfield his lot was 60 feet wide and a <br />shared driveway with the neighbor. <br />Citizen Input <br />Frank Antinozzi, 7041 147th Avenue NW, stated that he would be fine with a zero setback for <br />driveways as vehicles are parked next to each other when there are shared driveways. He stated <br />that not everyone parks in their driveway and the additional driveway space could be used for <br />maneuvering a trailer and not necessarily parking. <br />Commissioner Peters stated that in his neighborhood there was a house fire that jumped to a truck <br />which then exploded and therefore if there was another vehicle right next to that, it could have <br />easily jumped to the next vehicle. He stated that for that reason he would not support a zero setback <br />for the driveway, but could support a reduction. <br />Chairperson Gengler asked if the fire department had input on this change. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that fire did not have an interest one way or the other. <br />Mr. Antinozzi commented that fences can be installed along the property line and that would be <br />more flammable than a vehicle. He stated that if you drive around Ramsey there are a lot of <br />driveways to the property line, whether they received the proper approval or not. He stated that <br />he has also seen it in other communities. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated that the only location in Ramsey where he has seen driveways to <br />the property line is where the neighborhood is under a PUD with shared driveways. <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Planning Commission/ October 24, 2024 <br />Page 7 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.