Laserfiche WebLink
I left the reference to the statute in to help those who are reading it know where to look for the <br />requirement rather than just a general reference to as required by law. <br />• Page 23, Section 5.6(d) -WMO's do not have taxing authority. Delete or revise this section <br />accordingly. <br />This language is directly from the statute, but I revised it to focus on the county as the levying <br />authority. <br />• Page 27, Section 6.3(c)(1) - Language is generally acceptable, but questioned the difference <br />between "proposed" budget in this section and "operating" budget in section 6.3(c)(2). <br />• Page 27, Section 6.3(c)(2) - <br />o As noted above, what is the difference between "proposed" budget in section 6.3(c)(1) and <br />"operating" budget in section 6.3(c)(2). <br />The following is a summary of the comments the City of Anoka mentioned at the October WMO <br />Board meeting pertaining to the WMO JPA update. Some of these comments were mentioned by Dave this <br />morning at the meeting. <br />• General note - Include Andover/Anoka City Attorney draft appeal language provision in JPA. See attached <br />word document shared at the board meeting. <br />The appeal language was already in the JPA, but was limited to challenging CIP funding. 1 added the <br />genera! appeal provision and have both types of appeals handled by an arbitration board. I was <br />hesitant to add a general appeal provision like this because it potentially undermines the commission's <br />authority and is arguably an unlawful redelegation of authority (an appeal means the final decision on <br />the matter is made by this appeals board instead of the JPA's board). While governmental decisions <br />can be appealed to district court as a matter of law and due process, creating a separate process that <br />potentially overrides the board's decision outside a statutory or court process raises some issues. That <br />said, I put the language in. <br />• Page 7, Section III, Subsection 3.2 (a) - confusing, is this for member fees to the WMO and/or fee's <br />associated with permits the member has? Some times with invoicing for a member has a negative <br />balance reflected monthly treasurer's report so then the commissioner cannot vote at the month WMO <br />meeting? <br />• Page 12, Section IV, Subsection 4.1 (a) (9) - remove the word "dam" or exclude the "Anoka Dam" from this <br />subdivision since the Anoka Rum River Dam pursuant to WMO Resolution 2016-03 states "As sole owner <br />(City of Anoka) of the Dam, the city is responsible for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and <br />replacement of the Dam as may be needed." See attached pdf document for the adopted WMO <br />Resolution. <br />• Page 20, Section V, Subsection 5.5 (b) - is this allowed for member cities to really acquire land in another <br />member city? <br />A city's condemnation authority is not limited to its jurisdictional boundaries, though it would need <br />to be a pretty extraordinary situation for a city to exercise its power of eminent domain in this way. <br />