Laserfiche WebLink
for cities in this situation, LMCIT can issue an endorsement to increase the city's coverage limit only <br /> for claims relating to that particular contract, There's a small charge for these"laser" endorsements,} <br /> There may be more than One Political Subdivision Covered Under the City's Coverage <br /> An HRA,EDA, or port authority is itself a separate political subdivision, If the city EDA,for <br /> example, is named as a covered party on the city's coverage and a claim we're made that involved <br /> both the city and the EDA,theoretically the claimant might be able to recover up to $1,500,000 from <br /> both the city and the EDA, since there'are two political subdivisions involved. Excess coverage is <br /> one way to provide enough coverage limits to address this situation, Another solution is for the HRA, <br /> EDA,or port authority to carry separate liability coverage in its own name, <br /> This issue of multiple covered patties can also arise is if the city has agreed by contract to name <br /> p <br /> another entity as a covered party, or to defend and indemnify another entity, <br /> Cities Sometimes Carry Higher Coverage Limits Because of a Concern the Courts Might overturn the <br /> Statutory Liability Limits <br /> However,those limits have now been tested and upheld several times in Minnesota, while it's <br /> always possible that a future court might decide to throw out the statutory limits,this is now less o a <br /> concern, <br /> Available Excess Liability Coverage Limits <br /> Excess covera e is available in$1 million increments,up to a maximum of$5 million, <br /> g <br /> Does the Optional Excess Coverage Apply to All Types of Claims? <br /> No. The excess liabili coverage does not apply to the following types of claims: certain limited <br /> . pollution claims' mold,claims; claims for failure to supply utilities; auto no-fault claims;uninsured I <br /> underinsuied motcompensation,-disability,ori�st claims workers' or unemployment claims; or claims <br /> under the medical payments coverage, <br /> Who Needs Excess Liability Coverage? <br /> coverage is even more important to a small city rather than to a large city. <br /> If anything,excess liabilltY g p <br /> If a cityends up with more liability than it has coverage,the city will have to either draw on existing. <br /> � r <br /> funds or o to its taxpayers to pay that judgment. A large city faced with, say,a million dollar <br /> g s of F <br /> ' ` n above what its LMCIT coverage pays might be able to spread that$1 million cost <br /> liability over and g p �' I;. <br /> over several thousand taxpayers, The small city by contrast might be dividing that same$I million <br /> re taxpayers, 1 million divided among 5,000 taxpayers is$200 <br /> cost among only a couple hundred $ g <br /> apieceannoying <br /> -�anno in but probablyat least manageable for most taxpayers, $1 million divided among <br /> 200 taxpayers is $5,000 apiece—enough to be a real problem for many, <br /> r <br /> y <br /> i <br /> i <br /> f <br /> ' 3 1 I l <br /> 2 <br />