Agenda - Council - 11/26/2024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

• Page 21, Section V, Subsection 5.6 (b) (i)-the board is allowed to determine what member city's cost are, not the city council of the member city determines this? I am sure this has been a cooperative process, but ultimately the board decides how much it will contribute to a project, which means that by default the amount the city will need to pay for the project is being set. • Page 21, Section V, Subsection 5.6 (b) (ii)-in the sentence"Member contributions toward a CIP project may appeal the Board's determination by filling a written appeal to the Board within 30 days of the date of the resolution Board's resolution."Should the work"resolution"in red text be removed? • Page 25, Section V, subsection 5.7 (c) (4)-in the sentence"to due"should be"due to". • Page 28, Section VI, 6.3(c) (2)-should this be in the JPA since the WMO does not have the authority to tax? Paragraph(c)is about determining caps on a city's contribution,it does not involve the commission levyinganything. This is notrequired to be in the IPA, it has justbeen used in some WMOs to give the cities some comfort by limiting the amount of increase in the required contribution and placing a cap on the total amount a city may be required to contribute. • Page 31, Section VI II, 8.4-for sentence"Amendments shall be adopted by all governing bodies of the Members."This language seems to imply that governing bodies of Members "must" adopt amendments. However, staff believe the intent was that amendments must be adopted by governing bodies before changes and amendments to the Agreement may become effective.Which would seem to make more sense. • Page 32, Section VIII, 8.12-the word"extend"staff believes this word shall be"extent"not "extend".