My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/25/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 07/25/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:47:22 PM
Creation date
7/24/2006 9:04:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/25/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. Councilmember Cook explained from the park standard, if the four lots are turned into a park it <br />becomes dedicated land to the City and becomes the City's maintenance problem. The problem <br />with the pocket parks is getting the equipment in to maintain these areas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A representative of Orrin Thompson Homes stated he appreciates the comments related to the <br />park. He would like to point out that this plan basically doubles park space that was in the <br />previous plan by splitting it up and providing two smaller areas. Orrin Thompson Homes looked <br />at the idea of putting some of the park area into the south area, but there was not room for that. <br />Orrin Thompson Homes prefers to go forward with the plan as it is shown. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to grant revised <br />preliminary plat and site plan approval to Sunflower Ridge 2nd Addition contingent upon <br />compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated August 1, 2005 and reconsideration of tree <br />preservation plan. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Olson, Elvig, Jeffrey, <br />Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Sweet Bay Ridge; Case of <br />Oakwood Land Development <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director/HRA Executive Director Frolik stated Oakwood <br />Land Development has applied for preliminary plat approval of Sweet Bay Ridge to develop 158 <br />Urban service single family residential lots on the site of the property generally known as the St. <br />Anthony Gun Club, located on the east side ofVariolite Street. The preliminary plat identifies a <br />three-phase development plan. Access from this development is provided onto Variolite. Street at <br />three locations: 163rd Avenue, 1615t Avenue, and 159th Avenue. Outlot A will provide the <br />opportunity for a future street extension to the east. At the time of sketch plan review, there was <br />not a definitive direction to the Developer as to the extension of Traprock Street into Traprock <br />Commons to the south. The future corridor for Traprock to extend to the south has been platted <br />as Outlot B. In response to comments received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission - <br />recommends that there be some more minimum threshold of redevelopment that occurs before <br />Traprock is finished as a through street. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik indicated the development of the property with municipal water and sanitary sewer <br />required a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the land use from Rural Reserve to Low <br />Density Residential. On March 22, 2005, the City Council approved the amendment to the <br />Comprehensive Plan. The amendment was forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for approval. <br />On June 29, 2005, the Metropolitan Council took final action and approved the amendment to <br />the Comprehensive Plan. The property is now in the R-l Metropolitan Urban Service Area <br />(MUSA). She advised the net density allowed under R-l. is three units per acre. Thepreliminary <br />plat reflects a net density of 2.1 units per acre. All of the proposed lots meet or exceed the <br />minimum lot size. Most of the lots meet the 80-foot width requirement; approximately 8 lots... <br />require minor adjustments to comply with the lot width requirement. The mini:rI111m front-yard <br />structure setback is 30 feet. Because of wetlands arid tree cover, some of the lots' are designed <br /> <br />City Council! August 23, 2005 <br />Page 15 of 28 <br /> <br />-245- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.