Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />4. Exclusive Negotiation Agreement. The City agrees that during theterm of this <br />Agreement the City will not seek to negotiate a development agreement with any third parties for <br />the development and redevelopment of the Development Property. <br /> <br />5. Development Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, the City and Muir <br />agree to negotiate with one another in an attempt to reach an agreement on the terms of an <br />agreement for the development and redevelopment of the Development Property (the <br />"Development Agreement"). The City and Muir acknowledge and agree that in the negotiation <br />of the Development Agreement each party is entitled to pursue its own best interests and that <br />neither party shall be liable to the other party in the event that the parties are not able to reach a <br />mutually acceptable Development Agreement prior to the expiration or sooner termination of this <br />Agreement. The City and Muir anticipate that the Development Agreement will include, without <br />limitation, provisions addressing the following: <br /> <br />5.1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5.2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1919544v3 <br /> <br />City's Acquisition of the Development Property. As indicated in Recital <br />3.2, the City has commenced proceedings in Anoka County District Court <br />to acquire title to the Parcels through the exercise of the City's power of <br />eminent domain. Subject to Section 5.6 below, the Development <br />Agreement will obligate the City to proceed with the eminent domain <br />proceedings and to use commercially reasonable efforts to acquire <br />marketable title to and possession of each of the Parcels on or before July <br />15, 2007 (the "Acquisition Date"). The Development Agreement will <br />expressly provide that the City is not liable to Muir for the City's failure to <br />acquire title to and possession of all or any portion of the Development <br />Property on or before the Acquisition Date if the City has used <br />commercially reasonable efforts to do so; provided, however, if the City <br />has not been able to obtain title to and possession of all or any part of the <br />Development Property on or before the Acquisition Date, the <br />Development Agreement will obligate the City to continue to use <br />commercially reasonable efforts to acquire title to and possession of the <br />balance of the Development Property as promptly as reasonably possible. <br /> <br />APT Lease. The Parcel identified as Parcel I on Exhibit A is subject to a <br />Site Agreement dated June 28, 1996 as amended by a First Amendment to <br />Site Agreement dated , 1997 (the "APT Lease") between <br />KRH Land, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company and APT <br />Minneapolis Inc., a Delaware corporation ("APT"). The APT Lease <br />grants APT the right to construct, maintain, repair, replace and operate a <br />cellular telephone antenna on a portion of ParcelL The Development <br />Agreement will obligate the ~ity to terminate the APT Lease as apart of <br />the eminent domain proceedings or otherwise. The City will, for its own <br />benefit, attempt to relocate APT's-cellular antennas currently located on <br />Parcel I to City property, and the City agrees that the City will be solely <br />responsible for the payment of any amounts paid to APT or awardee! to <br />APT in the eminent domain proceedings as compensation fo'r the " <br />tennination of the APT Lease and the relocation of APT's improvements <br />to another site; provided, however, the foregoing provision is not intended <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />-275- <br />