Laserfiche WebLink
<br />· General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds: The City would need to create a Tax <br />Abatement District around existing properties and designate those property tax <br />collections to the repayment of the debt service. A key limitation is that the principal <br />amount of the bonds cannot exceed the sum of the total estimated abatements. The bonds <br />would be financed over a 20-year fixed rate at an average rate of 4.20%. <br />· Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue Bonds. These bonds would be issued by the City's <br />BRA. The security pledge would be an annual appropriation of lease payments by the <br />City (usually via tax levy) to the BRA to meet debt service. A mortgage on the property <br />would also need to be considered. The maximum marketable term on these bonds would <br />be 15 years with an average interest rate of 5.00%. The rate is higher as they are not GO <br />bonds. An appraisal of the property is required. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund reviewed financing Options A, B, C and D for the general obligation tax <br />abatement bonds and the annual appropriation lease revenue bonds. She advised the City needs <br />to finance $294,000 as part of the first payment on the scheduled closing date of June 30th. This <br />amount is rolled into Option C. Staff recommends that Option C - the issuance of a GO tax <br />abatement bond is selected for the purchase of the Boike property. This incorporates a lower <br />interest rate and includes the City's first required payment, and keeps the overall abatement <br />amount at approximately the same amount as originally proposed in the JP A, which language <br />will need to be amended. She indicated the County has changed language in the JP A to state the <br />County will pay 50% of the City's bonding amount. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey questioned how the City will make the $133,000 payments every year. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund replied there will be a levy; the levy of the parcels around the bridge <br />crossing will go towards this bonding. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey requested clarification that there will be a $133,000 shortfall from the <br />general fund to make up because the taxes brought in from the levy for the properties in this area <br />will go towards this bond payment. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund indicated the $133,000 will be added to the overall amount that is certified <br />for the levy; it will be added into the tax capacity rate that goes across the City. <br /> <br />Chairperson Strommen noted essentially this budget decision is being made now for next year. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated he supports this purchase, but the Council needs to take a long <br />look at the budget; $133,000 here means $133,000 that cannot be used somewhere else. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund advised another option would be to utilize the BRA or EDA levy and not <br />apply it towards other projects in the future; however, this $133,000 would use up almost half of <br />the $300,000 BRA levy. <br /> <br />Chairperson Strommen asked when the budget check-in is scheduled for the Council. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied the budget check-in will be scheduled in July. <br /> <br />Finance Committee / June 13, 2006 <br />Page 2 of5 <br />