Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~I! <br /> <br />.",--~...-.---.,-- ..- <br /> <br />C. h"1':: <oJ.. ~-. .,..... ',... -., <br />",t.., "..~'J ,.,~~", ..,,:--.--. .,- ~ , <br /> <br />.~'1.: ;~-~~~'~-:'f~\' . ~~._-'- <br />k~':-:" APi1983~' ::~:~ ~ . <br />RCMl\FJC:!1j29".i 83 <br />CL Tax Survey- '. . ' 't~.\ j~ <br />~ .' , .. . -92 " \j~ <br />.-ropertyT~~Jn~rease, ~rratic Pattern Pct222\~~, <br />EA," d:~:~~;~~::;; t~,i;::~;~i~i:~S';::t;;~f~;;~~'~(:; ;;'.~I~rl~i~~~" .' h~:- .;,~:'~ ~;:':~o~:"~~t[i~~i> <br /> <br />ague survey' of property taxes on an the rest of the m~nicipalities are at the estimated tax figures are_quIte different. ' <br />$80,000 house.' . low end of the property_tax rankings; . '. The difference is accounted 'for by the <br />lOf the 95 municipalities in the metro. .' The pUfJlose of the survey, which has' . sales ratio adjustrrienLThe:average house. <br />litan area with populations greater than' been conducted by the CL NEWS since :,: value figure in column te~-isa9jusfed b~ . <br />,500, 13 had mcreases of more than 35, the mid-1960s, is to illustrate how home~ ' state Department of Revenue sales rat!o <br />Ircent in 198.3,. .39 ha.d incre.ases be.. ' stead property taxes ge.nerallY comp..are ". ,figures to account for different asseSS' <br />een 20 and 3Spercent,t24 had in. . from community to community. The ment practices among communities. A-' <br />eases between ten and 20 percent; 13 chart on pages two and three shows how , . figure of $80,000 in cohimn ten would' <br />had increases between zero and ten :~~ .~ property taxes compare. It is not de~, '.: result in an esti.n1ated tax figure similar to <br />,rcent, and six had decreases.'. '- . signed to show how much you will pay',. the one in ~olunin one;':, . <br />A tax of $71S,orroughly .9 percent'.:':' 'in taxes on your home. However, if the,.... -:. , The average value figure for, each ,,';. <br />market value, is the median property~:,<,'~~ssessor pegs .thevalue 'of your house at;.,:, commu~ity ~as developed,using sta,t~ ;",;;;.," ; ~ .. <br />tax on a homestead selling for $80,000.';"';:";" the same level as is shown in column four,;'c Departmerit qf Revenue records. The,,' <br /> <br />I~,~:::':~~-::~:::;~ ~;~:;;~~:;~mTi:';~ c\:~it:: ;~":'~{;':::O~1:O::;-,~;i;~~~ ::'::~~U~~~:O~:;:1:~ia~'i~' ."': " <br /> <br />. Of the thirteen municipalities with~' :munity.' '.:: ;~: ,'f'",""':>__ ..' ;.~: ::::,:;,"numbero( llOmesteads. Dividing the total . <br />increases topping 35, percent-Arden 'C', A new feature in this year's survey is '.~:'-" assesse<i "value by the number of home:,; <br />.ls, Columbus Township, Deephaven, _ . the column at the righ~ hand side of the . steads gives'the average figure., The '.~' <br />.en Prairie, Fridley, Linwood Town-' chart. which shows the average house median value figure was unavailabie. ' <br />ship, Mounds View; New Brighton, North 'value in each municipality and the esti- Another new feature of this year's <br />(S' Saint Anthony, Shoreview, White mated tax on it. This column shows what survey.is the 'inclusion of more detail <br />ar Township and Woodbury-some are . the tax would be on a home which is. on mill rates. In past years, only the total <br />. . er ring and others, outer ring suburbs. . typical of the municipality, not of the , mill rate for each municipality has been,.,. <br />.:There is no clear pattern of wealth or _ 'whole metropolitan region. Average . wasincluded~,:JrnsY,ear. we list the.t~tal.::. <br />lowth among the communitieswith '. house values 'aiid estimated taxes range , . rate and the,c6mponerits\vhi~1iri1ake it ,. <br />pidly rising property taxes.;,: ~., from a high of $2) 1,870 ~,~_$~,841 iIi, up, showirig~r!tJllnite.sf~r schooldistricts, <br />, The six municipalities which showed North OaksCto"'-ilow of $54,877 and . ';'/'. cities or toWil'ships,-'countie'S'and special .' <br />decreases-Belle Plaine, Chaska. Farming- '., $387 in Belle Plaine. ". - '. ,:.<o,.<:J'i,.' ':taxing districts; in. columns. five through. <br />tn, Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount,:: ',,; In some cases, the estimatelliouse'. "'. nine., ", 'c( . . .... : ':. .: " ';. <br />d Jordan-are ~ outeuing S\lbu,rbs iii-.<=.value figure in column ten is fairly close'~ . Inall cases, the school mill rate is the <br />, . , ',.. " largest element of the total mill, rate. The, <br />. , " _ __, school mill rate shown includes 'any levy-' <br />MedianN~t' Piope~y :Ta~~s a Perce~~g~' ;,i Selli~'~ Price' on a"iy~i~1 H~m;~eaci'" . for' vocational-technical institutions' as, <br />In the Metropolitan Area, Annual Citizens League Survey ..' well as the'levy for'prim'ary-secondary <br />education. ~n looking at the figure for the <br />school district levy, keep"irlmind that <br />. school districts frequently cover parts of <br />. several municipalities, and municipalities <br />may 'contain' parts of several school dis- ' <br />triets.The school district number is listed <br />next to the name ofthe municipality in <br />the left hand coluIDn of the table.' <br />" Differences in county mill rates among <br />municipalities in the 'same county can . <br />. typically be accounted for by services: <br />provided only' in certain parts of the ' <br />county. Ramsey and Hennepin counties; <br />for exan1ple, leVy for library service in <br />. most of the county, but not in Saint Paul <br />or Minneapolis, cities which have their <br />own library systems. . <br />The miscellaneous levy is made up <br />(TAX continued on Page 4) <br /> <br />.,~.,-' . .,. <br /> <br /> <br />V"'l'::: ~"';~' ""'.'f'S'" <br />.: ,;; '" ~.' .~"'} ..~ '. ,~ <br /> <br />· "I.A~e~".', <br /> <br />UME X~XII, NO.7 <br /> <br />PUBLISHED BY THE CITIZENS LEAGUE (USPS 114.'80) <br /> <br />, <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />~. ~ <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />1.5 <br />'.0 <br />I <br />1.5 <br /> <br /> <br />--~.' -' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />I <br />I'~ <br /> <br />.. .... <br />. ... <br />... ". : <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />19i~ <br /> <br />ICJ73 <br /> <br />1974 1975 1976 <br /> <br />1()77 <br /> <br />J978 1979 )9~0 1981 1982 1983 <br /> <br />/ <br />/' <br /> <br />/ <br />. ./'''.'- <br /> <br />_.__....___ __~__~~_ --.:...---.;........__ ___~;..;.._._.~___~_~-_~----'--____~__".. _ __,_.__ _ __-..-c-'--~ <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />....-... <br />~ . ::. <br />