Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />b. Existing p:lrcel <br />c. Pro};X>sed split <br /> <br />nnmmission ~ction: <br /> <br />Your action will be to recommend denial of Mr. Fischer's request. <br /> <br />CASE '6: REODEST FOR SKETCH PLAN REVIEW: CASE OF MR. GARY PETRDCCI <br /> <br />Mr. Petrucci is requesting sketch plan review for his proposed <br />subdivision of pro~rty located southwest of Brook View Estates. Mr. <br />Petrucci is pro};X>sing to subdivide his 20 acre p:lrcel into two 2-1/2 <br />acre lots facing on GermanilJD Street N. W. and one large outlot. ibe <br />outlot would be a>nfigured so that a 66 foot wide strip would be left <br />facing Germanium Street to provide for a future roadway when the <br />rEmainder of the pro~rty is develo~. <br /> <br />Staff has reviewed the sketch plan and reoonmends that the CormIission <br />direct Mr. Petrucci to proceed with the preliminary plat as specified <br />~ City Code. <br /> <br />For your information, Enclosure (D2-e) oontains the following i terns: <br /> <br />a. Si te location <br />b. Pro};X>sed sketch plan <br /> <br />nnmmission Ar.tion: <br /> <br />Your action will be to direct Mr. Petrucci to proceed with the <br />preliminary plat of his pro~rty. <br /> <br />~E '7: DIsrnSSTON RF.:CARDI~ .S[JR:;ET. REGnlaATIONS FOR NON-CONFOR14JNG DSF...~ <br /> <br />As you requested, Enclosure (D2-f) contains a comparison of other <br />communities' .sunset. regulations for non-conforming uses. Also <br />oontained in this enclosure are excerpts regarding non-conforming <br />uses from zoning ordinances from the cx:mnunities in the comparison. <br />Ccmnissi01'lllE!l1lber Howell suboi tted a pro};X>sed revision of the Ci ty' s <br />non-oonforming use regulations to serve as a base for discussion <br />whidl is also included in this enclosure. <br /> <br />Cnmmission Action: <br /> <br />Your action will be based on your discussion. <br /> <br />CASE '8: DISmSSTQN RF.:CARDTNr.: ~I~ ORDINANCE <br /> <br />For your information, the City Council introduced the proposed <br />reoodified zoning ordinance on February 25, 1986. While reviewing <br />the pro};X>sed reoodified zoning ordinance for the final time, staff <br />had the following <nrments. <br /> <br />1. In the B-1 and B-2 business districts, the zoning ordinance calls <br />for minimum lot sizes of one acre. As much of the B-1 or B-2 <br /> <br />4 <br />