Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I( <br />I <br /> <br />Circlp- NW In Plinhwond RillR Sp-onnn A~itfnn! <br /> <br />'lbere was no representative fran Olateau Q:mstruction present. <br /> <br />Ci ty Engineer RAatikka stated that Olateau Cbnstruction feels that the cost to <br />replir sewer line problE!l'llS at 14155 Cobalt Circle are the responsibility of the <br />City. Mr. Raatikka stated that he is contending that the sewer pipe was not <br />improperly installed, that it was pulled loose ~ Olateau's p1.\JIlber at the time <br />of hook up. <br /> <br />fit>tion ~ Councilmenber Cox and seconded by Mayor Bei tman authorizing the Ci ty <br />Engineer to respond to Chateau Construction that the Ci ty finds that it has no <br />responsibility in the sewer problens experienced at 14155 Cobalt Circle tIi. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: City Engineer RAatikka stated that final testing of the <br />lateral sewer lines showed that the laterals were functioning properly. <br /> <br />fit>tion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Beitman, Q)lDlci1members Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Sdllueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />rARP IS! In.lp-r Rum RivP-r ManaOf:!ll'llP-nt nraani7.at;fnn AttniniRt.rat.ivp- Funding! <br /> <br />fit>tion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by CoWlCilmember Sdllueter to ply the <br />S\llle of $2,437.50 to the Lower Rmo River Water Management Organization <br />representing one-half (1/2) of Ramsey's 1986 aaninistrative contribution to <br />this organization. <br /> <br />fit>tion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Bei man, Councilmenbers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Sdllueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />~RP 16! F.n9; ~ri no! <br /> <br />A. Pnhlic R~ri.,g Fnr Trunk ~tt)rm g~r - WARt Dr~inaOP- QiRtricb <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that he and Mr. Goodridl met wi th Dave Kennedy, Ramsey's <br />bond counsel, regarding methods of financing trunk stoIm sewer improvenents in <br />the west drainage district. '!be following alternatives were discussed: <br /> <br />I. Special Assessnent to benef i ting property owners <br />II. Storm Sewer Improvsuent Taxing District <br />III. Ci ty Wide StoIm Sewer Improvenent Taxing District <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that Me. Kennedy strongly recommended not going wi th <br />Alternative I and going with Alternative II. <br /> <br />Mayor Beibnan stated that if the decision is to go with taxing districts, sane <br />thought should be given to establishing all the districts at one time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann pointed out that establishing all stom sewer taxing <br />districts at this time would unnecessarily alarm a lot of ci tizens; the same <br />ci tizens who would have input on the plblic hearings DOli may not be the same <br />ci tizens who will be affected when a need for stom sewer arises in a certain <br />taxing district. <br /> <br />Januaty 14, 1986 <br />Page 9 of 22 <br />