Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9. That the Applicant has stated that there will be no interior or exterior display of signs. <br /> <br />10. That the Applicant has stated that all appliances used in the bakery operation are typical <br />residential appliances with standard voltages; no commercial-style appliances will be <br />used. <br /> <br />11. That the Applicant has stated that no frying or grease is used in the bakery operation. <br /> <br />12. That the Applicant has stated that the cakes are delivered to clients' homes or to multiple <br />business locations within the metro area; there are no on-site sales involved with the <br />bakery operation. <br /> <br />13. That all deliveries are made with a personal vehicle; there are no commercial vehicles <br />involved with this operation. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed use will/will not adversely impact tra:t:"fic in the area. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed use will/will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to <br />persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed use will/will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or <br />market value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />17. That the proposed use will/will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future <br />neighboring uses. <br /> <br />18. That the proposed use wilVwill not be served adequately by public facilities and services <br />such as highways and streets. <br /> <br />19. That the proposed use will/will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost <br />for public facilities and services, and it will/will not be detrimental to the economic <br />welfare of the community. <br /> <br />20. That the proposed use wilVwill not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to <br />any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, <br />noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #06-08-_ <br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />43 <br />