My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/06/86
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
05/06/86
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 4:11:53 PM
Creation date
8/2/2006 12:08:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
05/06/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Marguerite Henke - 8062 154th Avenue - Stated that taxing districts is not a <br />fair a..e..ment. Tbe runoff from Whi.pering Pine. flows to a pond north of tbe <br />development; none of the runoff flow. acro.s Cty. Rd. 183. Ooly the propertie. <br />benefitting from the improvement. .hould be taxed. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka .tated that the estimated co.t for Pha.e 1 improvements in the <br />South Central Drainage District would be approximately $400,000. Estimated <br />cost per $70,000 household would be $175/year over a 10 year period. A <br />complete .torm sewer .ystem, if nece.sary, would be 2.3 million dollars. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman noted that drainage district boundaries were based on topography; <br />has any consideration been given to basing boundaries on intensity of problems <br />and the probable level of development? <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka replied that those items were not taken into consideration; <br />boundaries were based on where water flows and physical boundaries. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman inquired if there is a benefit in not declaring the entire city <br />as a taxing district. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley replied that the real test would be confidently identifying the <br />entire city as a drainage district; it has been done in other cities when the <br />topography lends itself to that kind of action. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich stated that the ordinance says areas shall be described with <br />particularity to be included within tbe taxing district; there has to be an <br />area of benefit and some areas really don't need taxing districts. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman noted that the entire city is going to be involved anyway if it <br />requires 10% of the registered voters to stop a project. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich stated that Ramsey's bonding attorney advised against <br />incorporating the entire City as a storm sewer taxing district; don't know the <br />particulars of that advice. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Heitman and seconded by Councilmember Cox directing the City <br />Attorney and the City Administrator to review the possibilities and <br />implications of establishing the entire community as a Storm Sewer Taxing <br />District and report back to Council with that information. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting Ro: Rone. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Mayor Heitman to direct City Staff <br />to place the subject of Storm Sewer Taxing Districts on the April 29, 1986 <br />Special Council Meeting Agenda. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting Ro: Rone. <br /> <br />Donald O'Connor - 15531 Iguana - Referred to comments stating that drainage <br />does not flow from Whispering Pines to Cty. Rd. #83; could that issue be <br />discussed at the April 29 Council Meeting? <br />April 22, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.