Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..-) <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman replied that if the license is granted, it would be <br />~nder cert~in cond'tions and violation of those conditions would result in <br />-,the license being evoked. <br /> <br />Tim Klingb~il - In <br />a building!permit; <br />adjacent property <br /> <br />uired how a 35' x 45' structure could be built without <br />that such a structure and odors from the bears affects <br />alues. <br /> <br />Carlton A~derson <br />submitted the nece <br />Tbe placem~nt of t <br />wild animal ordina <br /> <br />6331 153rd Lane N.W. - Inquired if Mr. Guyer has <br />sary information required for a wild animal license. <br />e encloBure does not meet specifications listed in the <br />ceo granting a variance would set a precedence. <br /> <br />Kathleen Artderson 6331 l53rd Lane N.W~ - Inquired if citizens will be <br />allowed anymore in ut into this case beyond this public hearing. <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman replied that the Planning Commis s ion will be making a <br />recommendation to ity Council J taking into consideration public c ommen ts. <br /> <br />Mr. Guyer ~plaine~ that the primary enclosure consists of a 3-sided, 35' x <br />45' cement iblock w~l1 structure with the 4th side consisting of chain link <br />fencing; t~e seconary enclosure is an electrical fence looping around the <br />chain linkiside of the primary enclosure; there is a shelter area within <br />the block Quilding for the bear. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Bill Wahl ~ 15403 unfish Lake Blvd. - Stated he lives directly across the <br />street froD). Mr. Gu ier; that the bears are securely caged and he doesn't see <br />them as a ~hreat; ~hat without prior notice, he has visited the property <br />and never 1..itnesse1 produce scraps lying about. nor detected any bad odors. <br /> <br />Kathleen AndersOn] Stated that the bea~ 1s allowed outside of the primary <br />enclosure a.nd does~'t feel secure with an electrical fence, that is not <br />. very high off the ~round, being allowed as the secondary enclosure. <br /> <br />Hr. Guyer ~..XPlaine~1 that heekeepers use the same 3-strand electrical fence <br />to keep bears out nd it is just as effective for keeping bears in; the <br />bears are ~nly allo ed out of the primary enclosure under his supervision. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlton Anderson - Noted that according to the ordinance, the secondary <br />enclosure should e tirely surround the primary enclosure. <br /> <br />Chairman Ziimmerma noted receipt of the following written comments <br />regarding ~r. Guyer's request: <br /> <br />, <br />! <br />Mary Westphal 6355 154th Lane N.W. - Opposing Mr. Guyer's request. <br />Jeff ~iles - 8r53 176th Lane N.W. - In favor of Mr. Guyer's request. <br />Katbl~en Ander!son - 6331 153rd Lane - Opposing Mr. Guyer's request. <br /> <br />Jerry Martin - 6614 153rd Lane N.W. - Inquired as to Mr. Guyer's reason for <br />wanting to keep bea s onbis property. <br /> <br />Mr. Guyer replied t at be keeps bears for bis pers onal enj oyment and not <br />Planni g & Zoning Public Hearing/February 2, 1988 <br /> <br />i <br />) <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />