Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-) <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Schneider and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to <br />recommend approval of the request for a conditional use permit for the <br />Faith Baptist Church of Ramsey for the location as stated in the findings <br />of fact and based on the findings of fact. Further. that the following <br />condition be included in the agreement: <br /> <br />That proposed future expansion be reviewed by Planning and Zoning. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson. Commissioners Isakson. <br />Schneider. Deemer. Zimmerman and LaDue. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Case #2: Consideration Of Park Fee Requirements: <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that he researched City records and current <br />requirement is $100/lot or 10% of assessed land value. whichever is greater. <br />Commissioner Deemer suggested that a committee be formed to research the <br />matter and come back with recommendations. <br /> <br />Commissioners Deemer and Isakson volunteered to attend the next reQular <br />Park Board meeting to obtain their input regarding park fee requirements. <br /> <br />.J'" <br />. . <br /> <br />Case #3: Request For Commission Input; Case Of Mr. Tom Holker: <br /> <br />Mr. Holker was not present. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg stated that Mr. Holker is requesting P&ZIS feelings regarding the <br />possibility 'of platting a 13+ acre parcel into two five acre parcels and <br />leaving the remaining three plus acres with the existing dwelling. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer noted that there is not adequate street frontage to <br />allow for 3 lots. . <br /> <br />It is the consensus of the Commission that two lots would be the maximum <br />allowed on that 13+ acre parcel. <br /> <br />COMMISSION INPUT <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson stated that he and Commissioners Zimmerman and Schneider <br />attended the special Council meeting on Monday. June 6. 1983 which was <br />to be a joint meeting of Council an~ Ramsey Commissions. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued among Commission members regarding that meeting. One <br />particular item discussed was Council's reaction to Mr. Peterson's letter <br />to Council regarding their decision in the Jim Gilbertson subdivision case. <br /> <br />Mr. Cox stated that he was surprised at Council IS decision in the Gilbertson <br />case. that it was contrary to the recommendation of P & Z and that the <br />decision does not follow proper platting process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schneider noted that she was very disappointed in the fact <br />that the joint meeting was to begin at 7:30 p.m. and actually didnlt <br />get started unt4l 9:30 p.m. and by that time nobody was in the mood to <br />discuss anything. . <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer. referring back to Council IS decision in the Gilbertson <br />case. stated that considering the amount Discount #10 Liquors sold for he <br />finds it hard to believe that proper platting presented a financial hardship. <br /> <br />P & Z/June 7, 1983 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />~ <br />