Laserfiche WebLink
Notification: <br />REQUEST TO REZONE OUTLOT B, AMBER RIDGE <br />FROM R -2 RESIDENTIAL TO R -1 RESIDENTIAL; <br />CASE OF E & G DEVELOPMENT, LLC <br />By: Sylvia Frolik, Asst. Community Dev. Director/HRA Exec. Director <br />a) Site location map <br />b) Preliminary Plat <br />c) Proposed Findings of Fact <br />d) Proposed Ordinance <br />Observations: <br />CASE # <br />Background: <br />Lawrence Olson of E &G Development, LLC, has submitted an application for an amendment to <br />the Comprehensive Plan. The request is to change the land use designation from Medium <br />Density Residential to Low Density Residential on Outlot B, Amber Ridge. The property is <br />located on the east side of T.H. #47, at the south terminus of Argon Street N.W. If the <br />amendment is approved by Metropolitan Council, it will be necessary to follow -up and rezone <br />the property on the Official Zoning, Map from R -2 Residential to R -1 Residential. The <br />Comprehensive. Plan Amendment and the rezoning will allow the applicant to develop the <br />property with single family homes. The developer is proposing to extend Argon Street south and <br />develop 5 single family homes around the extended cul -de -sac. The following items are enclosed <br />for your information: <br />In accordance with City Code, Staff attempted to notify owners of property within 700 feet of the <br />Subject Property of the request and public hearing. <br />The property is approximately 2 acres in size and is zoned R -2 Medium Density Residential, <br />permitting development at 4 to 7 dwelling units per acre. The properties to the north and east are <br />developed and zoned R -1 Residential, permitting up to 3 dwelling units per acre. The adjacent <br />parcel to the south is owned by the City, zoned R -2 Medium Density Residential, and contains <br />wetlands. <br />The preliminary plat, comprehensive plan amendment and zoning amendment were reviewed by <br />the Planning Commission on July 10, 2006. The Commission is of the opinion that development <br />of the property with low, rather than medium, density residential was preferable given existing <br />development in the area. <br />