My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/19/98
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Road and Bridge Committee
>
Agendas
>
1998
>
05/19/98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2025 11:16:16 AM
Creation date
8/18/2006 1:12:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Road and Bridge Committee
Document Date
05/19/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Background: <br /> <br />Over the Summer and Fall of 1997, the citizens along 149th Avenue between C.R. #56 and <br />Uranimite Street expressed a great deal of concern relative to speeding on that segment of <br />roadway. Attempts to mitigate the speeding problem included increased police patrol, placement <br />of an electronic speed display monitor, and the lpstallation of a temporary circle at the <br />intersection of Peridot Street and 149th Avenue in late Fall of 1997. At the April 14, 1998 <br />meeting, City Council directed that a feasibility study for the installation of a cul-de-sac be made. <br />Subsequent discussion of the problem at the April 21, 1998 Road and Bridge Committee meeting <br />resulted in the consensus that a "horse-shoe" or diagonal barrier be placed across the intersection <br />of 149th Lane and Uranimite Street. This study is intended to outline the improvements, costs, <br />and financing of both these alternatives for traffic calming. Both of these alternatives will result <br />in significant changes in the traffic patterns within the project area neighborhood illustrated in <br />Figure 1. A traffic count taken on April 30, 1998 shows 776 trips per day down 149th Avenue <br />with approximately 150 trips generated locally. Therefore, approximately 625 trips per day can <br />be expected to be shifted to other local streets. It is beyond the scope of this feasibility study to <br />predict traffic increases on other neighborhood streets. <br /> <br />Alternative A: Cul-De-Sac at 149th Avenue and Uranimite Street <br /> <br />This alternative would consist of the construction of a standard 90~foot diameter cul-de-sac <br />within the existing right-of-way of 149th Avenue as is illustrated in Figure A. In addition, it <br />would be necessary to remove 300 feet of pavement along the present Uranimite Street between <br />149th Avenue and 149th Lane. The scope of the work would involve pavement removal, <br />grading, placement of Class 5, four inches of bituminous paving, and turf restoration with topsoil <br />seed, fertilizer and mulch. There would also need to be some new traffic control signage at 149th <br />Lane and Uranimite Street and a dead end sign at 149th Avenue and Peridot Street. It is not <br />anticipated that any drainage structure will be required. Costs for this installation are <br />summarized in Appendix A. <br /> <br />In addition to the construction costs, project overhead of 25% is estimated to provide for <br />surveying, engineering design and inspection, and administrative costs associated with the public <br />hearing and assessment process. <br /> <br />Alternative B: Install Dia~onal Divertor at 147th Lane and Uranimite Street <br /> <br />This alternative consists of the placement of a barrier which would run from the southwest to the <br />northeast comer of the intersection of 149th Lane and Uranimite Street. This installation would <br />force all traffic to make only right turns at the intersection This alternative is illustrated in Figure <br />B. This alternative would involve the purchase and placement of concrete "Jersey" barrier across <br />the roadway. The project would also include reflectorization of the barrier and advance traffic <br />signage. The cost of this installation is estimated to be $3,975 which includes the purchase and <br />placement of the barriers, reflectorization, and signage. It also includes a 25% project overhead <br />cost for the necessary public hearings and administrative work related to the assessment <br />procedure. It should also be noted that these barriers could be rented for a three-month period for <br />$600. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.