Laserfiche WebLink
-168 <br />Mayor Gamec indicated two accesses have always been required with these developments. <br />Councilmember Elvig commented he believes the Council has been consistent with the message <br />regarding long cur -de -sacs. He does not think they are in a good place to reconsider this because <br />another piece of property has been purchased; this could be done all the way across town. He <br />initially thought this could possibly move forward because it was close, but buying a piece of <br />land after -hand does not allow them to turn the clock back. The City is not far from moving this <br />moratorium forward, and there are many things that needbe understood, not just the cul -de- <br />sac. <br />Request. fo <br />Pointe; Case <br />es: Co` <br />€ {members <br />staff <br />® =`e o <br />Ion; <br />he mo <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon indi <br />draft findings in support of denial of the exc <br />meeting. <br />Mayor Gamec indicated he would be in support <br />Council said Mr. Tallman should acquire another a <br />Councilmember Cook stated this project was <br />into place. Long ago at a work session th <br />and when the moratorium was coming fo <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he disag <br />The Council has never indicated they <br />the considerations. It will be onths <br />development, and it will be via,' , and the <br />Motion e <br />No: Mr <br />Pearson. <br />City Council / August 8, 2006 <br />Page 12 of 29 <br />irection as to whether to <br />ht b. k at a future <br />tion when - "`ring that the <br />a at all he has accomplished. <br />forward lo re e moratorium was put <br />e Mr. Tal rr go ahead to design this, <br />needed to • stain another access. <br />member Cook's recollection. <br />=sac and that they will hold all <br />um is over; this is a very viable <br />etting a precedent at that time. <br />Motion by Councilmemb '? 9 econded by Counci member Strommen, to direct staff to draft <br />findings of fact denying the r ® exception to the moratorium; Case of Ron Tallman. <br />ers Elvig, Strommen, Jeffrey, and Olson. Voting <br />inary Plat and Preliminary Site Plan Approval of Skyline <br />Skyline Partners, LLC <br />Asso i e= 6 $e Dalnes stag ® € nnesota Skyline Partners has submitted a preliminary plat and <br />site plan age • to d w, 52 units on the property generally located on the southwest <br />corner of A • ty Road 5 (Nowthen Boulevard). The revised preliminary plat <br />and site plan pro p , s = velop 18 bungalow- style, detached townhomes and 34 attached <br />townhomes on the 1 • located southwest of the corner of Alpine Drive and Nowthen <br />Boulevard. The prope is currently zoned R -1 Single - Family Residential and is guided as Low <br />Density Residential by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicants are seeking a Comprehensive <br />Plan amendment to re -guide the land as medium density residential in order to accommodate the <br />density that is proposed. The applicants are also seeking to rezone to Planned -Unit Development <br />