|
<br />Procedure. Once they complete their training, citizens can
<br />get to work. The programs have various procedures on how
<br />citizens work the neighborhoods and how they detect, report,
<br />and follow up on violations.
<br />Once they volunteer, citizens in Minneapolis survey the
<br />streets and alleys of their neighborhood. Working in pairs, they
<br />look for exterior housing maintenance code violations, such as
<br />tall grass and weeds, garbage, broken windows and torn screens,
<br />and graffiti. They also seek out zoning code violations regarding
<br />illegal parking of inoperable vehicles and commercial vehicles
<br />and trucks.
<br />~'hen it detects a violation, the neighborhood association
<br />sends a letter to the owner and/or tenants expressing concern
<br />about the particular situation and asking for the recipient's
<br />cooperation in improving and maintaining the neighborhood.
<br />At a later date, citizen inspectors return to see if the situation
<br />has been resolved. If the violation has been corrected, the
<br />association sends a thank-you letter. If not, it refers the situation
<br />to the city qousing inspections office for enforcement.
<br />Standard forms are used for doing initial inspections, follow-
<br />up inspections, and direct referrals to the inspections division.
<br />Standard flyers are also available to say a property looks great or
<br />to thank sojneone for correcting a violation.
<br />Residents in San Mateo also use standardized forms, which
<br />identifY the homeowners association involved in the inspection.
<br />These forms are used to contact the property owner directly
<br />regarding the situation. They requeSt correction or removal of the
<br />violation within 10 days of receipt of the notice. (For extensive
<br />problems such as house painting, a longer deadline is usually
<br />allowed.) Uncorrected violations are forwarded to the code
<br />enforcement division. There is also a standard form for the
<br />property owner or tenant to send to the code enforcement
<br />division, indicating that the violation has been corrected, does
<br />not exist, or can be corrected or removed if more time is granted.
<br />In contrast to those in San Mateo and Minneapolis,
<br />volunteers in San Diego are asked to work within their
<br />community but not in their own neighborhoods. They wear city
<br />photo identification badges that indicate they are city volunteers.
<br />San Diego volunteers address various violation issues. Some
<br />groups may/emove illegal signs from public rights-of-way, others
<br />may have to, canvass identified problem areas for a variety of
<br />violations. I;irst contact with a property owner is through a letter,
<br />identifYing the violation and requesting voluntaty compliance
<br />with the code. If that does not happen, the case is submitted to
<br />the NCCD for enforcement action and implementation of
<br />appropriate remedies.
<br />/1lStitutional Support. The San Diego program provides
<br />support to the volunteer groups on an ongoing basis. They meet
<br />monthly with an NCCD representative, where groups can turn
<br />over priority cases so that the city can send administrative
<br />citations, and they can also ask questions about specific ordi-
<br />nances or violations. At these meetings, the NCCD also updates
<br />the groups on the status of cases referred to it for fllrther aCtion.
<br />Groups receive staff support from the program coordinator, who
<br />administers the program, attends monthly meetings, and
<br />coordinates training sessions, and from NeCD investigarors and
<br />clerical personnel, who provide support in case processing.
<br />Success Rates. In Minneapolis, the inspections division has
<br />had a high success rate with its program, with approximately 75
<br />percent of those contacted by citizen inspectors making the
<br />requested improvements without involving the inspections
<br />department. In San Mateo, Leon Nickolas estimates that half of
<br />all forms issued by homeowners associations result in immediate
<br />
<br />4V
<br />
<br />~
<br />"f...
<br />.~
<br />.
<br />
<br />
<br />code compliance. Since San Diego's program began, volunteers
<br />have achieved 75 percent compliance and have closed more than
<br />1,000 cases, primarily through letters sent to violators and
<br />through direct conversations. As Ty Rogers, program
<br />coordinator, says, "The purpose of the volunteers is to inform
<br />and educate the public. (Their) job is to be the nice guy. The
<br />city of San Diego's job is enforcement."
<br />
<br />:::~~:.' ',~:: ;:~'; +c: .:: t. 1~,the,1I!orkS;~?-~~~~ ',>:: '!~?:;;,~~<'~.'
<br />
<br />. :;--
<br />
<br />Just underway in Atlanta, the housing inspections
<br />division is creating a citywide Neighborhood
<br />Deputy Program, an expansion of a pilot code
<br />enforcement program conducted by the Atlanta Project
<br />(TAP). Created in 1991 by former President Jimmy
<br />Carter, TAP's aim is to help Atlanta's poorest
<br />communities gain access to needed resources to solve their
<br />problems. According to TAP's World Wide Web site, the
<br />Brown Village area pilot program has helped empower
<br />residents and restore community pride. By canvassing the
<br />community, volunteers reported more than 300 code
<br />violations to the city.
<br />Still in the development stage, the cirywide program
<br />will focus on housing code violations, such as peeling
<br />paint and yard debris. The volunteers will make courtesy
<br />citations to residents, warning them that violations exist
<br />and need to be corrected. It is anticipated that the project
<br />will be Funded in rhe next budget cycle beginning in
<br />Januaty 1998, with the program expected to start in
<br />March 1998.
<br />When the program is ready, it will have three
<br />components: a brochure, a monitoring program, and a
<br />computer software program to track violations. The
<br />brochure, to be distributed to the neighborhoods, will
<br />inform residents of their rights and describe the
<br />procedures to be followed and agencies to be contacted to
<br />enforce city ordinance violarions~ Current issues of
<br />concern include abandoned cars, deteriorated or vacant
<br />buildings, dead animals, broken fire hydrants, and srreets
<br />in need of repair.
<br />The monitoring program, a supplement to the
<br />brochure, will promote resident and community
<br />participation in identifying violations. The computer
<br />program, a joint endeavor berween the city and TAP, will
<br />track violations to encourage neighborhood code
<br />enforcement efforts.
<br />
<br />.~~
<br />
<br />..~-..'
<br />
<br />"
<br />. 'i.":'
<br />
<br />; :-~,~~~
<br />
<br />
<br />San Diego presently has 130 volunteers from 30 community
<br />planning groups. In 1996, volunteers donated more than 3,000
<br />hours to the city, saving San Diego $45,000 in code
<br />enforcement staff salaries.
<br />
<br />:". ,
<br />
<br />The Real World
<br />While volunteer programs can result in better compliance, they
<br />can also dramatically increase the workload of enforcement
<br />departments. In San Mateo, the four-person code enforcement
<br />department will be hiring an additional person by the end of
<br />this year and anticipates growing to six people in 1998. Vonnie
<br />Linnell says Minneapolis breaks even on workload changes,
<br />with rubbish and grass-related violations decreasing and issues
<br />such as housing maintenance increasing.
<br />Programs do not always run smoothly. Some communities
<br />have encountered fake inspectors. Minneapolis has experienced
<br />incidents where persons were ringing doorbells, passing them-
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />4:
<br />
<br />-.
<br />""'~~
<br />
<br />:;i~:. .
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />;~.
<br />
<br />.'.;
<br />
|