Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Procedure. Once they complete their training, citizens can <br />get to work. The programs have various procedures on how <br />citizens work the neighborhoods and how they detect, report, <br />and follow up on violations. <br />Once they volunteer, citizens in Minneapolis survey the <br />streets and alleys of their neighborhood. Working in pairs, they <br />look for exterior housing maintenance code violations, such as <br />tall grass and weeds, garbage, broken windows and torn screens, <br />and graffiti. They also seek out zoning code violations regarding <br />illegal parking of inoperable vehicles and commercial vehicles <br />and trucks. <br />~'hen it detects a violation, the neighborhood association <br />sends a letter to the owner and/or tenants expressing concern <br />about the particular situation and asking for the recipient's <br />cooperation in improving and maintaining the neighborhood. <br />At a later date, citizen inspectors return to see if the situation <br />has been resolved. If the violation has been corrected, the <br />association sends a thank-you letter. If not, it refers the situation <br />to the city qousing inspections office for enforcement. <br />Standard forms are used for doing initial inspections, follow- <br />up inspections, and direct referrals to the inspections division. <br />Standard flyers are also available to say a property looks great or <br />to thank sojneone for correcting a violation. <br />Residents in San Mateo also use standardized forms, which <br />identifY the homeowners association involved in the inspection. <br />These forms are used to contact the property owner directly <br />regarding the situation. They requeSt correction or removal of the <br />violation within 10 days of receipt of the notice. (For extensive <br />problems such as house painting, a longer deadline is usually <br />allowed.) Uncorrected violations are forwarded to the code <br />enforcement division. There is also a standard form for the <br />property owner or tenant to send to the code enforcement <br />division, indicating that the violation has been corrected, does <br />not exist, or can be corrected or removed if more time is granted. <br />In contrast to those in San Mateo and Minneapolis, <br />volunteers in San Diego are asked to work within their <br />community but not in their own neighborhoods. They wear city <br />photo identification badges that indicate they are city volunteers. <br />San Diego volunteers address various violation issues. Some <br />groups may/emove illegal signs from public rights-of-way, others <br />may have to, canvass identified problem areas for a variety of <br />violations. I;irst contact with a property owner is through a letter, <br />identifYing the violation and requesting voluntaty compliance <br />with the code. If that does not happen, the case is submitted to <br />the NCCD for enforcement action and implementation of <br />appropriate remedies. <br />/1lStitutional Support. The San Diego program provides <br />support to the volunteer groups on an ongoing basis. They meet <br />monthly with an NCCD representative, where groups can turn <br />over priority cases so that the city can send administrative <br />citations, and they can also ask questions about specific ordi- <br />nances or violations. At these meetings, the NCCD also updates <br />the groups on the status of cases referred to it for fllrther aCtion. <br />Groups receive staff support from the program coordinator, who <br />administers the program, attends monthly meetings, and <br />coordinates training sessions, and from NeCD investigarors and <br />clerical personnel, who provide support in case processing. <br />Success Rates. In Minneapolis, the inspections division has <br />had a high success rate with its program, with approximately 75 <br />percent of those contacted by citizen inspectors making the <br />requested improvements without involving the inspections <br />department. In San Mateo, Leon Nickolas estimates that half of <br />all forms issued by homeowners associations result in immediate <br /> <br />4V <br /> <br />~ <br />"f... <br />.~ <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />code compliance. Since San Diego's program began, volunteers <br />have achieved 75 percent compliance and have closed more than <br />1,000 cases, primarily through letters sent to violators and <br />through direct conversations. As Ty Rogers, program <br />coordinator, says, "The purpose of the volunteers is to inform <br />and educate the public. (Their) job is to be the nice guy. The <br />city of San Diego's job is enforcement." <br /> <br />:::~~:.' ',~:: ;:~'; +c: .:: t. 1~,the,1I!orkS;~?-~~~~ ',>:: '!~?:;;,~~<'~.' <br /> <br />. :;-- <br /> <br />Just underway in Atlanta, the housing inspections <br />division is creating a citywide Neighborhood <br />Deputy Program, an expansion of a pilot code <br />enforcement program conducted by the Atlanta Project <br />(TAP). Created in 1991 by former President Jimmy <br />Carter, TAP's aim is to help Atlanta's poorest <br />communities gain access to needed resources to solve their <br />problems. According to TAP's World Wide Web site, the <br />Brown Village area pilot program has helped empower <br />residents and restore community pride. By canvassing the <br />community, volunteers reported more than 300 code <br />violations to the city. <br />Still in the development stage, the cirywide program <br />will focus on housing code violations, such as peeling <br />paint and yard debris. The volunteers will make courtesy <br />citations to residents, warning them that violations exist <br />and need to be corrected. It is anticipated that the project <br />will be Funded in rhe next budget cycle beginning in <br />Januaty 1998, with the program expected to start in <br />March 1998. <br />When the program is ready, it will have three <br />components: a brochure, a monitoring program, and a <br />computer software program to track violations. The <br />brochure, to be distributed to the neighborhoods, will <br />inform residents of their rights and describe the <br />procedures to be followed and agencies to be contacted to <br />enforce city ordinance violarions~ Current issues of <br />concern include abandoned cars, deteriorated or vacant <br />buildings, dead animals, broken fire hydrants, and srreets <br />in need of repair. <br />The monitoring program, a supplement to the <br />brochure, will promote resident and community <br />participation in identifying violations. The computer <br />program, a joint endeavor berween the city and TAP, will <br />track violations to encourage neighborhood code <br />enforcement efforts. <br /> <br />.~~ <br /> <br />..~-..' <br /> <br />" <br />. 'i.":' <br /> <br />; :-~,~~~ <br /> <br /> <br />San Diego presently has 130 volunteers from 30 community <br />planning groups. In 1996, volunteers donated more than 3,000 <br />hours to the city, saving San Diego $45,000 in code <br />enforcement staff salaries. <br /> <br />:". , <br /> <br />The Real World <br />While volunteer programs can result in better compliance, they <br />can also dramatically increase the workload of enforcement <br />departments. In San Mateo, the four-person code enforcement <br />department will be hiring an additional person by the end of <br />this year and anticipates growing to six people in 1998. Vonnie <br />Linnell says Minneapolis breaks even on workload changes, <br />with rubbish and grass-related violations decreasing and issues <br />such as housing maintenance increasing. <br />Programs do not always run smoothly. Some communities <br />have encountered fake inspectors. Minneapolis has experienced <br />incidents where persons were ringing doorbells, passing them- <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />4: <br /> <br />-. <br />""'~~ <br /> <br />:;i~:. . <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />;~. <br /> <br />.'.; <br />