My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/07/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/07/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:40:19 AM
Creation date
9/1/2006 3:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/07/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Got Trees? <br /> <br />By Chris Duerksen, Molly Mowery, and Michele McGlyn <br /> <br />Tree protection legislation has burgeoned at the local level, with hundreds of <br />communities adopting tree conservation ordinances over the last decade. <br /> <br /> <br />These regulations have evolved well beyond the <br />tirst generation of ordinances that focused on <br />preserving large specimen trees into more mod- <br />ern approaches such as requiring the protection <br />of a percentage of the existing tree canopy on a <br />site. Some local governments are even contem- <br />plating tying tree protection to a reduction in <br />carbon dioxide emissions from new develop- <br />ments as part of their programs to address <br />global warming and climate change. <br />This issue. of Zoning Practice discusses <br />recent trends in' local tree protection, including: <br /> <br />. reliable sources that can help communities <br />establish the value of trees and the ratio- <br />nales for protecting them; <br /> <br />. key legal issues and recent court decisions <br />regarding tree protection; <br /> <br />. popular regulatory approaches t~ saving <br />trees; and <br /> <br />. cutting-edge tree protection programs <br />around the United States. <br /> <br />SmlNG THE FOUNDATION: WHY SAVE TREES? <br />The rationale for saving trees falls into three <br />broad categories: aesthetics and community <br />character, environmental health, and economic <br />benefits. While community officials have been <br />aware of the aesthetic and environmental bene. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />o <br />~ <br />o <br />o <br />. <br />u <br /> <br />98 <br /> <br />tits of tree conservation for many years, only in <br />recent years have they begun to fully appreciate <br />its economic benetits. <br />Community aesthetics and domestic <br />well-being. Trees and other greenery .help <br />shape our view of the built environment in a <br />positive way, making the places where we <br />live, work, and do business more attractive <br />and livable. Trees help provide tranquil spaces <br />and havens from the sun, wind, and noise. <br />They make buildings more "human" in scale, <br />softening hard edges and creating a sense of <br />place and identity. Trees are even adopted as <br />municipal symbols in communities nation- <br />wide, reflecting aesthetic values upon which <br />they build a name for themselves; For exam. <br />pie, Tallahassee, Rorida, is increasingly <br />known as the dogwood capital of the South <br />for its aggressive program of planting dog. <br />woods along streets throughout the city. <br />Annually, dozens of communities compete for <br />the honor of being designated a "Tree City <br />USA" by the National Arbor Day Foundation. <br /> <br />Beyond aesthetics, however, growing evi- <br />dence suggests that trees may even serve to <br />promote domestic well-being. In The Experience <br />of Place, author Tony Hiss writes that in <br />Chicago's public housing projects the residents <br />of buildings surrounded by green space with <br />trees (vs. barren land) had a stronger sense. of <br />community, better relationships with their <br />neighbors, and fewer incidents of domestic vio- <br />lence. Similarly, scholarly works have long docu- <br />mented the ways in which the incorporation of <br />natural features into design can promote well- <br />ness and reduce stress. <br />Environmental health. Trees are a funda- <br />mental component of the movement to <br />"green" our infrastructure. Natural green <br />infrastructure, consisting of functioning <br />ecosystems with trees and vegetation, pro- <br />vides many valuable services related to <br />groundwater recharge, stormwater manage- <br />ment, pollutant filtration, and soil and water <br />conservation. American Forests, the nation's <br />oldest nonprofit citizens conservation organi- <br />zation and a pioneer in the science and prac- <br />tice of urban forestry, has developed the <br />Urban Ecosystem AnalysiS process to study <br />the green infrastructure benefits of a forest <br />canopy. The benefits relate primarily to resi- <br />dential summer energy impacts, air pollution <br /> <br />ZONING PRACTICE 7.06 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 1 page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.