My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1995 Working Papers
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1990-1999
>
1993 (Incompleted)
>
1995 Working Papers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2006 8:45:02 AM
Creation date
9/14/2006 8:43:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-of' <br /> <br />t- <br /> <br />City of Ramsey Stafr <br />February 27, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />The design concept for the bridge includes an interchange with Highway 10, a grade separated <br />overpass across the'railroad track, and a T-intersection with CR 116, which would provide <br />east/west continuity between the Rum River and Puma Street. <br /> <br />Some of the transportation and land use benefits of this alignment are: <br /> <br />. The alignment preserves important north/south cross streets, which could continue to <br />operate at-grade with intersection control. <br /> <br />. The T -intersection with CR 116 presents an opportunity for traffic to go east to Ramsey <br />and Sunfish Lake Boulevards or west to Armstrong boulevard and Puma Street. <br /> <br />. The alignment provides a direct, non-circuitous route to existing residential development <br />and to areas where residential development is forecast to occur. <br /> <br />. T -intersections, which only include three intersection legs, typically operate efficiently <br />and exhibit high levels of service. <br /> <br />. The interchange with Highway 10 would be located between Ramsey and Armstrong <br />Boulevards. Therefore, the cost of acquiring existing businesses in this area would be <br />borne by MnlDOT (perhaps with some participation from the City). If the bridge <br />alignment, and consequently the interchange, were in another location, the City would <br />have to bear the cost of acquisition alone. <br /> <br />. The alignment presents opportunities for rational land use planning, preserving land with <br />a scenic view of the river for residential development and locating commercial/retail uses <br />in areas that can be quickly and efficiently accessed from the bridge alignment. <br /> <br />In this way the eastern alignment separates residential traffic and commercial/traffic, <br />allowing the former access north of CR 116 and the latter access south of CR 116. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.