Laserfiche WebLink
<br />", <br />"V"-'.;. <br /> <br />,"(' <br /> <br />5. EDC claims surrounding communities, primarily Dayton, are undecided.' Actually, Dayton <br />has withdrawn its support for the east location because so many citizens oppose it. <br /> <br />6. If the west alignment is selected, the surrounding land will be zoned commercial not <br />residential as suggested by EDC. The west location has significant commercial <br />development potential, which is not possible with the east alternative. Commercial <br />development will view the west bridge as a benefit, not a disruption. <br /> <br />Deficiencies in Road Design - Capacity <br /> <br />EDC's road design was intentionally under specified so it would compare favorably. The <br />combination of a "diamond" interchange at Highway #10 (when a cloverleaf is needed) and a "T" <br />intersection at c.R. #116 will not accommodate the expected volume of traffic. <br /> <br />Deficiencies in Road Design - Safety <br /> <br />A safe diamond interchange could be developed, however EDC focused on minimizing property <br />acquisition instead of safety. Inadequate clearance between the Highway #10 acceleration/ <br />deceleration lanes and adjoining driveways is provided. The EDC design has trucks carrying tons <br />of equipment from Kovar and liquid petroleum from two propane dealers entering and exiting the <br />acceleration and deceleration lanes. <br /> <br />Additional property is needed for a safe interchange at Highway #10. A safe intersection with <br />adequate traffic flow will require a "cloverleaf' not a diamond interchange. <br /> <br />Site Constraints Resulting in Additional Cost <br /> <br />The constraints imposed by existing businesses, critical rivers boundary and railroad tracks <br />increase the likelihood that a more costly interchange design will be required. <br /> <br />Site Constraints Resulting in Diminished Commercial Potential <br /> <br />The constraints imposed by the existing businesses, critical rivers boundary and railroad tracks <br />virtually eliminate any commercial potential at this intersection. <br /> <br />Political Fallout <br /> <br />The citizens of Ramsey have been alerted to the current transportation plan which depicts a four <br />lane approach corridor through Ramsey. Many people believe that public officials have not been <br />completely candid on this issue. <br /> <br />These citizens may perceive selection of the east location (with an approach corridor stopping at <br />C.R. #116) to be a politically-motivated half step toward achieving the roadway depicted in the <br />current Transportation Plan. This opposition may result in a referendum. <br /> <br />DISCREPANCIES IN GROMBERG'S REPORT <br /> <br />On December 12, 1994, Jim Gromberg published a memo which claimed to compare costs for the <br />east and west bridge alternatives. The memo actually compared EDC's plan to a west bridge plan <br />he developed. The plan he developed differs significantly from the Planning Commission <br />recommendation and would be more costly to build. This tactic may have been used to inflate the <br />cOSt of the west alternative. <br /> <br />Planning Subcommittee Memo to Council/January 13, 1995 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />