Laserfiche WebLink
Authority <br />State law authorizes City police depailiuents to conduct criminal history background <br />investigations on applicants for City positions using Minnesota Computerized Criminal History <br />data. <br />Applications <br />This section applies only to applicants who are finalists for regular, temporary, seasonal, casual, <br />and volunteer positions. Before a finalist is eligible to receive a conditional job offer or begins <br />employment with the City, and to the extent permitted by law, the applicant must authorize the <br />Police Department, in writing, to undertake a criminal history background investigation and to <br />release the information to the City Council, City Administrator and/or other City staff as <br />appropriate. <br />Rejection of Applications <br />Except in the case of exceptions set forth in Minnesota state law, as amended from time to time, <br />if the City rejects an application for employment, either partly or solely to the applicant's prior <br />conviction of a crime that directly relates to the position sought, the Administrative Services <br />Director will notify the applicant in writing of the following: <br />• The Grounds and reasons for denial; <br />• The applicant complaint and grievance procedure set forth in Minnesota State law, as <br />amended from time to time; <br />• The earliest date the applicant may reapply for employment or a volunteer position; and <br />• That all competent evidence of rehabilitation will be considered upon re -application. <br />Only public conviction information related directly to the position sought will be considered in <br />denying employment. In situations where identity is in question, fingerprint verifications will be <br />allowed, to the extent permitted by law. The City reserves the right to consider the applicant's <br />criminal history, including any and all evidence of rehabilitation, to the maximum extent permitted <br />by law. <br />3.8 Reclassification <br />When a position's duties and responsibilities change (increase or decrease), the position is <br />considered a reclassification. It may be automatically filled by the incumbent of the original <br />position, contingent upon the incumbent's ability to meet the position's minimum requirements <br />and possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities, at the City's discretion. <br />3.9 Nepotism <br />The potential for conflicts of interest is increased when personnel who are related are employed by <br />the same employer; and real or implied conflicts of interest can result in distrust and a general lack <br />of harmony among other employees. <br />Whenever possible, and with due regard for job -relevant qualifications, merit, and fitness, the <br />employer shall avoid appointing any person related to an appointed officer or regular full-time or <br />111Page <br />