Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Carl Ohm <br />Mr. Jon Olson <br />July 1, 1994 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />17) TH 252 - 11.7% DHF, 35% southbound - 65% northbound <br />18) I-35W -- 8.5% DHF, 40% southbound - 60% northbound <br />19) TH 169 Bridge - 9,65% DHF, 40% southbound - 60% northbound <br />20) TH 610 Bridge -- 13.6% DHF, 40% southbound - 60% northbound <br /> <br />Table 2 shows the PM design hour volumes resulting from the calculations <br />using the above data. <br /> <br />Existing and Year 2015 Capacity Analysis <br /> <br />A capacity analysis was completed for the screenline roadway locations for the <br />existing conditions and the four Year 2015 modeled conditions. Table 2 <br />displays the number of lanes per direction and the level of service at each <br />screenline roadway location, The level of service was calculated using <br />methodologies documented in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual and <br />Highway Capacity Software. <br /> <br />Vehicle Miles Travelled <br /> <br />The number of daily vehicle miles travelled (VMT) at the screenline roadway <br />locations are displayed below. <br /> <br />· 1990 Existing = 325,445 VMT <br /> <br />· 2015 Base Case E+C = 465,625 VMT, 43% increase from 1990 Existing <br />· 2015 Base Case E+C+P = 468,095 VMT, 44% increase from 1990 Existing <br /> <br />· 2015 Expanded MUSA E+C = 475,895 VMT, 46% increase from 1990 <br />Existing and 2% increase from 2015 Base Case E+C <br /> <br />· 2015 Expanded MUSA E+C+P = 476,295 VMT, 47% increase from 1990 <br />Existing and 2% increase from 2015 Base Case E+C+P <br /> <br />tt/b'd tE:tt Vb. 0t ~n~ <br />