Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Carl Ohm <br />Mr. Jon Olson <br />August 8, 1994 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />· 2005 Expanded MUSA E+C = 703,410 VMT, 24% increase from 1990 <br />Existing and 1 % increase from 2005 Base Case E+C <br /> <br />· 2005 Base Case E+C+P = 697,670 VMT, 23% increase from 1990 Existing <br /> <br />· 2005 Expanded MUSA E+C+P = 703,969 VMT, 25% increase from 1990 <br />Existing and 2% increase from 2005 Base Case E+C+P <br /> <br />· 2015 Base Case E+C = 770,642 VMT, 36% increase from 1990 Existing <br /> <br />· 2015 Expanded MUSA E+C = 783,942 VMT, 39% increase from 1990 <br />Existing and 3% increase from 2015 Base Case E+C <br /> <br />· 2015 Base Case E+C+P = 772,248 VMT, 37% increase from 1990 Existing <br /> <br />· 2015 Expanded MUSA E+C+P = 782,183 VMT, 38% increase from 1990 <br />Existing and 1% increase from 2015 Base Case E+C+P <br /> <br />Results and Conclusions <br /> <br />The PM design hour volume level of service (LOS) analysis, as shown in Table <br />2, reveals the following: <br /> <br />1) Year 1990 existing conditions are primarily at LOS D, with TH 10/47 <br />near Main Street and TH 252 near 1-696 at LOS E. In a metropolitan <br />area, LOS D is an acceptable level of operation. <br /> <br />2) Year 2005 forecast LOS for both scenarios and roadway improvements <br />show that four screenline locations are operating at LOS E. This <br />condition will exist regardless of the MUSA expansion. <br /> <br />3) Year 2015 forecast LOS for both scenarios and roadway improvements <br />show that eight screenline locations are operating at LOS E and that <br />three screenline locations are operating at LOS F. This condition will <br />exist regardless of the MUSA expansion. <br /> <br />I' <br />II Ii .. <br />-ia.ke.o.;- ~,~~ J".J; ~ ~rh1USAj. 0~1%} <br />- ~~~ ~ ~/~ VO~JI'11-0~ tdf!oj <br />