Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Alternative designs will be evaluated for each proposed community <br />septic system. Design alternatives may include, but not be limited <br />to, standard drainfields, sand filters with standard drainfields, <br />multiple mound systems, alternating seepage beds with pressure distri- <br />1::mition of ~ffluentf ruck system (methanol mediated ni~rate reduction <br />to nitrogen gas), sand filters with surface discharge, extension of <br />sanitary sewer service to the affected area. The selection of an <br />appropriate septic system design will be ~ased on soil suitability, <br />ground water effects (mounding, contamination), area requirements, <br />surface discharge requirements, etc. Cost analysis will include <br />assessment of the projected extension date of public services, if any, <br />to ti;1e sulb~E!ct area. <br /> <br />A city of Ramsey ~rmit will be required for installation of any <br />community "septic s~stem. If average daily floW exceeds 10,000 <br />gallons, a permit from MPCA is required as well. As part of the MPCA <br />permit, monitoring wells are required. The city of Ramsey may require <br />monitoring or other septic system performance data on systems <br />producing less than 10,000 gallons per day. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />In short, while a regional rural preservation policy may be laudible <br />and indeed workable in some outlying areas of the metropolitan region, <br />it makes little sense to apply it to a community where nearly 75% of <br />the land area outside the MUSA is currently developed. <br /> <br />There is not an extensive rural character to maintain. There is <br />little agriculture which can be expected to continue. Lastly, there <br />is no physical or environmental basis for restricting development due <br />to sewage disposal requirements for 10 acres of land. <br /> <br />At the same time, " the City recognizes that long term low density <br />development (2.5 acre lots) such as is occurring in Ramsey and in <br />neighboring communities can be more expensive than typical urban <br />settings. This is due to demands for some urban level services such <br />as parks development, streets, fire protection even though these costs <br />must be distributed over much lower population densities. <br /> <br />-c- <br />