Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,j <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Quality of Life Rating <br /> <br />Residents were initially asked: <br /> <br />How would you rate the quality of life in this com- <br />munity - excellent, good, only fair, or poor? <br /> <br />A solid ninety-five percent rated the quality of life as "excellent" or 'good:" <br /> <br />EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43% <br /> <br />GOOD ........................................... 52% <br /> <br />ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5% <br /> <br />POOR ............................................ 0% <br /> <br />DON'TKNOW/REFUSED ............................ 1% <br /> <br />Only five percent were more critical in their judgments. The forty-three percent "excellent" <br />rating placed Ramsey within the top quartile of suburban communities. <br /> <br />Higher ratings were posted by less than five year residents, 18-34 year olds, owners of over <br />$125,000 homes, households connected to public sanitary sewer and water services, and residents <br />of Precinct lB. Lower ratings were found most often among five-to-twenty year residents, <br />households containing children, 35-44 year olds, owners of under $100,000 homes, households <br />not connected to public sanitary sewer and water services, and residents of Precinct 1 A. <br /> <br />Residents offering evaluations less than "excellent" were asked a follow-up query: <br /> <br />What change or improvement would it take for you <br />to raise your rating from to [NEXT <br />HIGHEST]? <br /> <br />Seventeen percent pointed to "slower growth," while fifteen percent mentioned "improvement of <br />city services:" <br /> <br />NOANSWER .....................................27% <br /> <br />SLOWER GROWTH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17% <br /> <br />MORE PARKS ..................................... 5% <br /> <br />IMPROVE CITY SERVICES '" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 15% <br />LESSEN TRAFFIC .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8% <br />IMPROVE CITY GOVERNMENT ..................... 7% <br /> <br />LOWER TAXES .................................... 4% <br /> <br />MORE RECREATION ACTIVITIES.................... 3% <br />MORE SHOPPING .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8% <br />OTHER RESPONSES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6% <br /> <br />Eight percent each wanted "lesser traffic congestion" and "more shopping opportunities," while <br />seven percent pointed to "improvement of city government." <br /> <br />"Slower growth" was suggested most often by residents of Precinct Two. "Improvement of city <br /> <br />16 <br />