My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Telephone Survey
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Community/Regional Input
>
Telephone Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2006 10:15:05 AM
Creation date
9/19/2006 10:14:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br />that way? <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />-1 ,. . .. <br /> <br />By a sixty-six percent to twenty-six percent margin, residents approved, if necessary, of the use <br />of city funds to pay part of the cost of construction and improvements to Highway 47: <br /> <br />STRONGLY FAVOR ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33% <br /> <br />FAVOR.......................................... 33% <br /> <br />OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16% <br /> <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE .............................. 10% <br />DON'T KNOWIREFUSED .. . . . ... ..... . . .. . . ." .. ." . 8% <br /> <br />Intense support was over three times higher than intense opposition. <br /> <br />Support was strongest among 18-34 year olds, owners of$100,000-$125,000 homes, women, and <br />residents of Precinct Two. Opposition was highest among over 45 year olds and residents of <br />Precinct 3A. <br /> <br />Traffic on Residential <br />Streets <br /> <br />Respondents were asked: <br /> <br />How serious of a problem on residential streets in <br />your neighborhood is traffic - very serious, some- <br />what serious, not too serious, or not at all serious? <br /> <br />Only twenty-seven percent rated traffic on residential streets in their neighborhood as either "very <br />serious" or "somewhat serious:" <br /> <br />VERY SERIOUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12% <br />SOMEWHAT SERIOUS. . .. . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . ... 15% <br />NOT TOO SERIOUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28% <br />NOT AT ALL SERIOUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44% <br />DON'TKNOW/REFUSED ............................1% <br /> <br />Sixty-two percent considered this issue to be oflesser severity. <br /> <br />"Not too serious" was higher among owners of over $125,000 homes. "Not at all serious" was <br />highest among owners of $100,000-$125,000 homes. <br /> <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.