Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Cindy Sherman <br />January 13, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />affordable and life-cycle housing planning and development efforts, through at least the year 2010. The <br />goals are included here to fulfill the affordable housing planning requirements of the Land Planning <br />Act. " <br /> <br />Mississippi River Critical Area -- (Sandra Pinel, 651-602-1513) <br /> <br />The city of Ramsey borders the Mississippi River and includes lands designated as part of the state <br />Mississippi River Corridor Critical, state Wild and Scenic River and Mississippi National River and <br />Recreation Area (1988) for multiple economic, recreational, aesthetic and environmental purposes. <br />Critical Area plans have been required since 1976 but Ramsey never received state approval for an earlier <br />plan. The final plan and ordinance will be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and approved by the <br />Department of Natural Resources for consistency with minimum state standards and guidelines in <br />Executive Order 79-19. Under a cooperative agreement with the National Park Service, the Metropolitan <br />Council also reviews plans for consistency with the additional voluntary resource protection policies <br />contained in the 1995 MNRRA plan. <br /> <br />Critical Area and MNRRA standards are addressed in both the Critical Area chapter and other sections of <br />the land use plan. The plan was clearly written and included many policies for protection of <br />environmental and scenic values that went beyond minimum state requirements and addressed goals in <br />the MNRRA plan. Staff provided the City with a preliminary review of the draft plan on September 30, <br />1998 and provided technical assistance to the City's consultants in October and December, encouraging <br />the City to aim for MNRRA certification. Based on these comments, the City revised the Critical Area <br />chapter and requested a second informal Critical Area review on December 22, 1998. That review will be <br />completed under separate cover and sent to the City before the end of January for possible incorporation <br />into the revised plan for formal review. Comments in this letter are limited to general consistency of <br />other comprehensive plan elements (land use, public facilities) with Critical Area guidelines. <br /> <br />Land use and MUSA extensions: Although much of Ramsey's river corridor is now developed into homes <br />on septic tanks or urban services, the Critical Area designation for almost all of the corridor in Ramsey is <br />"Rural Open Space District". Lands within that district are to be used and developed to preserve their <br />open, scenic and natural characteristics and ecological and economic functions and undeveloped islands <br />shall be maintained in their existing and natural state. This overall designation remains even if the area is <br />included in the MUSA. The City is proposing that almost all the river corridor be included in the MUSA <br />and be planned for Mixed Residential at a density of five units per acre. Althoughthe area can be <br />developed, it would be inconsistent with the purposes of the designations to concentrate urban housing in <br />the river corridor and leave areas away from the river more rural. The City needs to include language in <br />the plan to ensure that future development will be consistent with protection of natural features and open <br />space and will maintain the natural view of the river. This can be accomplished in the MUSA through <br />clustering, shoreline and bluff protection and setback policies and programs for acquiring or protecting <br />permanent open space. Adopting site development and open space policies consistent with the MNRRA <br />can also accomplish it. The plan could expand on the purposes of the proposed greenway and density <br />credits in order to ensure that open, scenic and natural characteristics are preserved within any future <br />development. <br /> <br />Public facilities: We commend the City for including an objective for studying the aesthetics and other <br />issues related to the Critical Area along Highway 10 corridor. Plans and designs for transportation <br />facilities should provide for scenic overlooks, pedestrian crossings and access to land between the <br />highway and ensure that such facilities do not stimulate incompatible land uses. Critical Area plans must <br />also include a policy to minimize and concentrate river crossings. The City should include those policies <br />