1999 Correspondence - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~ e Page Two Chesterton Commons 4th Add. Comprehensive Plan Amendment February 4, 1999 E. List adjacent local governmental units and other jurisdictions (school districts, watershed districts, etc.) to which copies of the plan revision or amendment have been sent, and the date the copies were sent to them. (Required by Minn. Stat. 473.858, Subd. 2). Cities of Oak Grove, East Bethel. Ham Lake, Blaine Coon Rapids, Anoka, and Ramsev; Coon Creek Watershed District, Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization, Independent School Districts #11 and #15 SECTION II: CONFORMITY WITH METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS A. Transportation I-Does this plan revision or amendment potentially increase existing trip generation (use Institute of Transportation Engineers trip-generation manual)? _ No. . ifno, Skip to #5. L Yes.. if yes, . What is the estimated average daily traffic increase? Specific use has not been determined. . What is the estimated peak hour traffic increase? Specific use has not been determined. 2.Does the existing local and regional road network (including metropolitan interchanges) have the capacity to accommodate planned land use(s)? -.X Yes _ No. . ifno, briefly describe the improvements to local or regional roads or interchanges that will be required to accommodate the planned use(s): Are these improvements included in a Capital Improvements Program? _ Yes. . briefly describe who will pay for improvements _ No . . Please explain 3.Does this plan amendment impact transit service or facilities either positively or negatively? -.X No _Yes . . briefly describe 4.Can the potential traffic impacts of the land use be mitigated by implementing Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or through land use and urban design measures that encourage alternatives to single occupancy vehicles (SO V)? LLNo _ Yes. . please describe (e.g., park & rides, flexible work hours, mixed land uses)