Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Page Two <br />City of Andover <br />City Hall Area <br />August 12 1998 <br /> <br />SECTION II: CONFORMITY WITH METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS <br /> <br />A. Transportation <br /> <br />I.Does this plan revision or amendment potentially increase existing trip generation (use Institute of <br />Transportation Engineers trip-generation manual)? <br />L No.. ifno, Skip to #5. <br />_ Yes.. if yes, <br /> <br />o What is the estimated average daily traffic increase? <br />oJ.Yhat is the estimated peak hour traffic increase? <br /> <br />2.Does the existing local and regional road network (including metropolitan interchanges) have the <br />capacity to accommodate planned land use(s)? <br />Yes <br />_ No. . ifno, briefly describe the improvements to local or regional roads or interchanges that will be <br />required to accommodate the planned use(s): <br /> <br />Are these improvements included in a Capital Improvements Program? <br />_ Yes. . briefly describe who will pay for improvements <br /> <br />_ No . . Please explain <br /> <br />3.Does this plan amendment impact transit service or facilities either positively or negatively? <br />No <br />_Yes . . briefly describe <br /> <br />4.Can the potential traffic impacts of the land use be mitigated by implementing Traffic Demand <br />Management (TDM) strategies or through land use and urban design measures that encourage alternatives <br />to single occupancy vehicles (SO V)? <br />No <br />_ Yes. . please describe (e.g., park & rides, flexible work hours, mixed land uses) <br /> <br />5.Is this proposed land use change located adjacent to a principal arterial or "A" minor arterial? <br />No <br />