1999 Correspondence - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

e e Page Two Andover Station Comprehensive Plan Amendment February 4, 1999 Management Organization, Independent School Districts #11 and #15 SECTION II: CONFORMITY WITH METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS A. Transportation I.Does this plan revision or amendment potentially increase existing trip generation (use Institute of Transportation Engineers trip-generation manual)? _ No. . ifno, Skip to #5. ..1L Yes . . if yes, . What is the estimated average daily traffic increase? Specific use has not been detennined · What is the estimated peak hour traffic increase? Specific use has not been detennined. 2.Does the existing local and regional road network (including metropolitan interchanges) have the capacity to accommodate planned land use(s)? --.X Yes _ No . . if no, briefly describe the improvements to local or regional roads or interchanges that will be required to accommodate the planned use(s): Are these improvements included in a Capital Improvements Program? _ Yes. . briefly describe who will pay for improvements _ No . . Please explain 3.Does this plan amendment impact transit service or facilities either positively or negatively? --.X No _Yes. . briefly describe 4.Can the potential traffic impacts of the land use be mitigated by implementing Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or through land use and urban design measures that encourage alternatives to single occupancy vehicles (SOV)? No X Yes. . please describe (e.g., park & rides, flexible work hours, mixed land uses) Trails will be constructed to encourage non-motorized trips to and from the proposed commercial park. 5.Is this proposed land use change located adjacent to a principal arterial or "A" minor arterial? No --.X Yes. . please describe site access to the arterial, and whether location and spacing of the access is consistent with Access Spacing Guidelines The site is bounded bv CSAH 116 (Bunker Lake Blvd NW)