Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />-- ' <br /> <br />6. Residential facilities for staff; this may be a continuation of the usage of the present <br />single family homes on the campus, or could conceivably be dormitory or cottage- <br />type residences; <br />7. Other uses, not yet identified, which will serve to promote our mission statement. <br />We are concerned that the proposed classification of our parcels in the current draft of the <br />proposed comprehensive plan may not accommodate our potential planned uses without a <br />plan amendment, which could be cumbersome. <br /> <br />We would like the City to consider a classification of this area which could in fact be <br />sufficiently broad to enable our ultimate development with local approvals only. Perhaps <br />it would be necessary to create a new zoning category, such as some type of "Religious <br />Planned Unit Development". Any other suggestions you might have would also be <br />welcome. <br /> <br />We are ultimately limited in the campus expansion by some existing permanent uses and <br />roads, but do have an interest in acquiring additional properties to the north of us. Since <br />these acquisitions are at present speculative, we do not wish to interfere with the rights of <br />those property owners to develop in accord with the new plan classifications. However, if <br />there is some way of allowing those properties to be added to our campus without a comp <br />plan amendment in the future, perhaps that could be addressed as well. <br /> <br />We will be in touch with City staff to inquire further about these suggestions." <br /> <br />· The City is aware of the plans the church has for their property. Unless there is an <br />interest in developing a particular land use designation for churches we believe that <br />the current designation of quasi-public and mixed residential would allow most of the <br />uses as they relate to church activities. Changing the site to mixed use, in conjunction <br />with the land to the north, is another alternative. If mixed use were used in an area <br />other then where it is currently designated on the plan some modification to the goals <br />and policies would have to be done to make it broader in scope. The details of the site <br />planning would be addressed through zoning regulations that will be developed in the <br />near future. <br /> <br />The Katnis property on Hwy 47 is currently zoned B-1 and is proposed to be designated <br />as high density residential on the land use plan. The property owner has been working <br />with an attorney and planner to identify uses that they feel would allow them the highest <br />and best use of their land. <br /> <br />· Staff has had discussions with the property owner's representatives and we believe <br />that a small service retail center mixed with high density residential may be <br />appropriate. Designating the site for mixed use would allow the site to develop with a <br />limited mix of uses that could be further regulated by zoning. <br />