Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />11 <br />I: <br />I~ <br />i <br />I. <br />I: <br />I' <br />I <br />I- <br />I, <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Ii <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />; <br /> <br />There are no designated agricultural preservation areas in Ramsey. There are a few large <br />contiguous areas remaining which have either a significant agricultural history or long term <br />future prospect of remaining "productive agricultural land". Approximately 3,130 acres, <br />however, are currently enrolled in the "Green Acres" Program. These parcels are shown on <br />Figure 6. <br /> <br />The character of the City is generally a transition from the more densely developed urban use <br />through less densely developed suburban to rural use areas. This transitional character extends <br />well beyond Ramsey. Neighboring communities of Andover to the east and Burns to the north are <br />significantly developed with two and one-half (2.5) acre residential lots. To the west, Elk <br />River has three zoning classifications with minimum lot sizes of one (1) acre in the future <br />sewered area, minimum lot sizes of two and one-half (2.5) acres in the transitional non- <br />sewered areas and minimum lot sizes of 10 acres in agricultural preservation areas. <br /> <br />Given the existing development and character of the City, and considering that outlying <br />communities beyond Ramsey have zoning that has resulted in similar lot size developments, no <br />portion of the City can be construed as being totally rural. Rather, Ramsey is a transitional <br />Community which may be more accurately classified as having a sewered urban area and a non- <br />sewered residential transition area. <br /> <br />Rural Use Policy <br /> <br />Prior to January 1, 1990, the policy of the City was to limit development outside of the MUSA <br />to one lot per 10 acres of remaining undeveloped property with a minimum lot size of two and <br />one-half (2.5) acres. Table 6 indicates that 3,687 acres of land in the "rural" area would be <br />undeveloped (approximately 25%). Also indicated on Table 6 is the existing development <br />density of the "rural" area which is one lot per 1.9 acres. With the City's 2.5 acre minimum <br />lot size applied to remaining undeveloped land, that density can be reduced to one lot per 2.8 <br />acres. As a contrast with the implementation of "four in forty" zoning on the remaining <br />developable land, the lowest average overall density that can be achieved is one lot in 3.6 acres. <br /> <br />The City of Ramsey adopted Ordinance #89-33 to implement "4 in 40" land use density for <br />remaining undeveloped parcels outside of the designated MUSA. The ordinance is in compliance <br />with regional goals for rural density with recognition of development rights associated with <br />parcels of record as of January 1, 1990. The ordinance does not and cannot reverse the <br />development pattern of past years but does create land use zones which will allow future public <br />service expansion into the City's urban reserve area. In addition, the ordinance provides for a <br />diversity of living styles in the community by assuring long term rural areas that development <br />will be restricted to compatible uses and densities appropriate to rural areas. <br /> <br />Implementation of 4/40 Zonina <br /> <br />Numerous subdivisions were proposed and entered into the City's subdivision review process <br />while the City was considering adoption of MC's 4/40 rural use policy. City Staff worked with <br />MC Staff to provide an orderly transition period such ,that all plats or PUD's which received the <br />City Council's preliminary approval prior to January 1, 1990 (the anticipated effective date of <br />adoption for 4/40 zoning) would be allowed to develop under the then current ordinance (2.5 <br />acre lots). This provided slightly less than a six month transition process to convert from two <br />and one-half (2.5) acre density to 4/40. Figure 2 illustrates the subdivision locations which <br />received approvals prior to January 1, 1990. Ordinance #89-33 further allows development <br />of existing lots of record as of January 1, 1990. <br /> <br />1 2 <br />