My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Trail Development Volume I
>
Park & Recreation Comm Miscellaneous
>
Trott Brook Corridor
>
Trail Development Volume I
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2006 11:28:56 AM
Creation date
9/22/2006 11:27:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />To investigate the grooming process and what it entails, Anoka and Hennepin <br />County Parks and Recreation departments were contacted for informational interviews on <br />cross country skiing. The authors located a park that implemented a maintenance <br />program similar to that which could be devised for the Trott Brook corridor. These parks <br />have some of the best cross country skiing in the area and both have established trails on <br />pavement. These parks provide programs that groom their trails anywhere from three <br />days a week, as in Bunker Hills Park, located in Coon rapids, to twice a day every day of <br />the week for Elm Creek Park Reserve, located in Maple Grove. <br /> <br />Individually, these facilities have top of the line maintenance equipment. They <br />also possess the funding and labor to endorse quality programs. However, it was <br />conveyed that grooming once a week or even after every snowfall, with a properly <br />designed program, would be adequate for trail ways with less access to funds and labor <br />(Cook, 1996): It was further acknowledge~ by these metro area parks that "the right <br />lightweight equipment" would be sufficient in handling the grooming pressures of <br />facilities with shorter trails that are designed only for traditional skiing. This applies to <br />the type of trail plan the City of Ramsey may implement. <br /> <br />Officials from Elm Creek Park Reserve of Hennepin County were contacted to <br />investigate their use of lightweight equipment in grooming their trails. Although Elm <br />Creek Park Reserve uses a snocat ($45,000) for some of their trail grooming, they also <br />have developed and currently use some less expensive lightweight equipment that could <br />effectively groom the cross country ski trails along Trott Brook (Cook, 1996). <br />Lightweight grooming equipment can be defined as devices that are designed to be pulled <br />behind a snowmobile in preparing the trail for use. <br /> <br />They have three forms of lightweight equipment that they use for compacting the <br />snow, with frequency of use depending on the conditions presented at the time of <br />grooming. The first is a Tidd Tech, the second is a modified version of the Tidd Tech, <br />specially designed by Elm Creek Park Reserve, and the third is a unit consisting of a <br />single large roller. The Tidd Tech and its modified version are used for the actual trail <br />grooming, while the roller unit is used solely for snow compaction. <br /> <br />For large amounts of snowfall, the roller is initially used to compact the snow to <br />a degree in which the two groomers can be effective. When snowfall is under eight <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.