Laserfiche WebLink
the applicant's requested deviation from architectural standards to paint the rock face block, and <br />contingent upon the receipt of a variance to the rear yard setback requirement. <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Brauer requested clarification that the 20 foot setback will not <br />cause any problems. Associate Planner Dalnes replied not from what she has observed. Mr. <br />Sharp explained there would be 20 feet of green and another 10 feet of green that belongs to Life <br />Fitness. Commissioner Brauer indicated there should be consideration of other businesses that <br />will be expanding and matching an existing building. Associate Planner Dalnes noted Council <br />will have discretion on whether to approve these types of ®nsiop <br />RJM building located on Sunwood Drive and Bunker 4 <br />Community Deg;'�� <br />ors for the existing <br />- Road, that som <br />ck activity <br />expansr <br />and deterrr <br />situation with painted rock face block on the additi <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Ig; om ®e ® "� d, :,:auer, Levine, <br />Hunt, and Trites Rolle. Voting No: None. Abs' <br />Case #6: Request for Site Plan Review o <br />Wolf <br />Assistant Community Development Direct <br />submittal from Green Valley Greenhouse <br />6421 Green Valley Road. The site plan <br />the northeast corner of what is show o <br />of the site. The former greenhouse e <br />shipping warehouse and dock. doc <br />explained the greenhouse open 8 " exists in <br />Permit (CUP). The CUP was . 'led in 200 <br />and established a maxim <br />the 40 acre parcel. The may <br />The addition . _the warehou <br />The relo �. ,- and the <br />perime <br />scr <br />Ms. Frolik <br />the City Staff <br />Chairperson Nixt aske <br />Review Letter. <br />g coverage an <br />ilding coverage <br />It in a total <br />will not <br />Mr. Sharp commented the <br />d was the same type of <br />ting building. <br />Case of Brad <br />stated tha' r received a site plan <br />ing warehd o the facility located at <br />o relocate one of the greenhouses in <br />ddition ", to the southeast corner <br />or the new 7,176 square foot <br />g erth and two docks. Ms. Frolik <br />ential District by Conditional Use <br />e 5 -7 year growth plan of the facility <br />um buffer area around the perimeter of <br />under the 35% rule is 572,855 square feet. <br />building coverage of 443,951 square feet. <br />encroach the 65 foot buffer yard around the <br />t Director Frolik indicated staff is suggesting that because the <br />se, this newly proposed warehouse and future warehouse face <br />s be established along Green Valley Road to establish some <br />Frolik stated the Engineering Department has reviewed the <br />at the proposal does not impact the surface drainage pattern. <br />ends approval of the site plan contingent upon compliance with <br />the applicant has any questions or comments regarding the City Staff <br />Mr. Brad Wolf, applicant, indicated Green Valley Greenhouse has typically not included the <br />curbing required in the City Staff Review Letter as part of their site improvements. <br />Planning Commission /September 7, 2006 <br />Page 14 of 21 <br />-221- <br />