Laserfiche WebLink
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Cleveland, Hunt, Levine, and <br />Trites Rolle. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Brauer and Van Scoy. <br />NOTE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />The following Council minutes were noted: <br />1) City Council regular meeting minutes dated July 25, 2 <br />2) City Council regular meeting minutes dated August 8, <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS /COMMISSION BUSI <br />Case #1: Public Hearing - Request for ; Case of <br />Case #2: <br />Case #3: <br />Presentation <br />EDM Investments, Inc. <br />Public Hearing — Request to Rezon B -2 Business to Planned <br />Unit Development (PUD); Case of DPM Inve nc. <br />Public Hearing - Reque ; a i }apiary Plat a e " Preliminary Site Plan <br />Review of Ebony Woody •eof ® stments, Inc. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes indic <br />stated DPM Investments <br />Comprehensive Plan. The <br />Medium Density Residen <br />of the Super B . Ms. Dalne <br />twinhom it buil <br />Shop <br />Co <br />for co <br />orient. Ms. Daln ,a <br />or proposed land <br />ive Plan update. <br />ion. <br />D <br />eside <br />to <br />se Nos. <br />milted an <br />to change <br />operty located on the east side of Ebony Street, just south <br />DPM Investments is proposing to develop the site with 6 <br />'eh would require a land use change from Places to <br />inning Amendment is also before the Planning <br />rezori property from B -2 Business to Planned Unit <br />ed on April 26, 2005, the City Council adopted an Interim <br />anges that are requested prior to the completion of the <br />alnes reviewed the interim policy criteria as it realtes to <br />The submi � . <br />®.. <and preliminary site plan were evaluated according to current R -2 <br />Medium Densi cn " standards for twinhomes. The plan meets all requirements with the <br />exception of lot wig ° R -2 District requires a 50 -foot lot width, and the plan shows five 40- <br />foot lots and one 44- ot. Staff is recommending that the reduced lot width be considered for <br />approval as part of the PUD because the proposal is meeting all other lot standards and setback <br />requirements, and because the twinhome buildings will have less bulk and a lower profile than <br />the townhome buildings that were previously proposed for this site. <br />Planning Commission /September 7, 2006 <br />Page 2 of 22 <br />be discussed together. Ms. Dalnes <br />for an amendment to the 2001 <br />use designation from Places to Shop to <br />—343- <br />