Laserfiche WebLink
with the office use, and that the property owner should try to determine if they could get an office <br />tenant in there. He believes this is the same as that case, and he sees no reason to change this <br />zoning. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Comrnissioners Levine, Brauer, Cleveland, Hunt, and. Trites Rolle. <br />Voting No Chairperson Nixt. Absent: Commissioner Van Scoy. <br />Motion by Commissioner Levine, seconded by Commissioner Cleveland, to recommend that the <br />City Council approve findings of fact to support denial of ;. rezo g of the property from B -2 <br />Business to Planned Unit Development, with finding nos. as follows: <br />13. That the proposed development, if revi <br />surrounding land uses. <br />14. That the proposed development will not <br />market value of surrounding properties. <br />15. That the proposed development will prese <br />features, woodlands, and steep slopes. <br />16. That the proposed development will protect and pres <br />extent possible. <br />17. That the proposed development <br />facilities, including fire and po <br />sewer systems and storm sewer <br />18. That the proposed developmen <br />unified environment wi <br />uses in the surrounding <br />Carried. Voting <br />'tes Rolle. Votin . <br />enities such <br />of be compatible with <br />ence on the <br />etlands, water <br />qualities to the greatest <br />undue bu = ` on public services and <br />ols, streets, water systems, sanitary <br />ay as to form a desirable and <br />will be detrimental to future land <br />Motion carried. Voting airperson Ni'� issioners Levine, Cleveland, Brauer, <br />Hunt, and Trites Rolle. V one. Absent: Commissioner Van Scoy. <br />by Commissioner Brauer, to recommend that the <br />from B -2 Business to Planned Unit Development <br />Motion <br />City <br />base <br />Chairp <br />any reason <br />Consensus of the <br />Council were to approv <br />airperson Nixt, Commissioners Levine, Brauer, Cleveland, <br />None. Absent: Commissioner Van Scoy. <br />mmission to provide comments as to whether there would be <br />plat if Council were to determine to approve the rezoning. <br />on was that there is no apparent reason to deny the preliminary plat if <br />e rezoning. <br />Commissioner Levine commented the applicant has come back with a much better plan than the <br />first plan submitted. <br />Planning Commission /September 7, 2006 <br />Page 10 of 22 <br />—351— <br />