My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2025
>
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:53:14 AM
Creation date
1/15/2025 8:14:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/14/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i. <br /> i <br /> Senior Planner Martin replied that cities typically include that information, but it would not <br /> p yp �' <br /> necessarily need to be included. <br /> r: <br /> 1' <br /> Councilmember woestehoff stated that perhaps the total sign area is the top line of that table as 1 <br /> Counc� p p <br /> that would provide the necessary guidance. <br /> l. <br /> Commissioner Peters stated that perhaps those could be combined into one row,including the total <br /> Comm p p <br /> sign area and explaining there is no maximum number of signs. <br /> g p g <br /> Chairperson Gen ter asked if there are examples in the area of a 100 square foot sign on a wall. <br /> Senior Planner Martin was unsure. F` <br /> Planning ManagerLarson could not think of but rovided some dimens ions that could be 100 <br /> any p <br /> square feet. He stated that it does fall in line with what other cities allow. <br /> Councilmember woestehoff asked if the same standards would apply to a single tenant. <br /> Senior Planner Martin replied that would not apply. He explained that there is language to ensure <br /> that one tenant does not take up all the space and that signage is split between the tenants in a <br /> multitenant space. <br /> Councilmember woestehoff asked if there is a scenario where space on the signage could be used <br /> to advertise something else, such as the development itself. <br /> Senior Planner Martin commented that he could not recall any instance of non-tenant signage with <br /> the exception of the Ramsey office plaza,which is identified on the sign. <br /> Commissioner Bauer asked if space for lease within the building would count as non-tenant <br /> signage. <br /> Planning Manager Larson explained that real estate signage is temporary and covered in another <br /> area of the code. He stated that this line is meant to address individual tenants not an individual <br /> sign. He stated that staff could clarify that language. <br /> Senior Planner Martin stated that he will make the changes as discussed and bring the final draft <br /> back for consideration at a later time. <br /> 7.02: Discuss the Sign Code Pertaining to Freestanding, Temporary and Additional wall <br /> Signage <br /> Presentation <br /> Senior Planner Martin presented the Staff Report asking the Commission to provide direction to <br /> staff to develop clear, consistent and simplified regulations for freestanding, temporary and <br /> additional wall signage in all zoning districts. <br /> Planning Commission/November 21,2024 <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.