Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> I' <br /> A? <br /> 1. <br /> Senior Planner Martin provided some examples of signs that would seem to be applicable within <br /> S p pfr. <br /> the COR for the six-foot maximum. <br /> f <br /> �j <br /> Councilmember woestehoff stated that the maximum height for a ground sign could be six feet F <br /> F <br /> where the maximum height for a pylon sign could be 25 feet. <br /> Senior Planner Martin asked if the Commission preferred the term ground sign or monument sign, <br /> 'n that pylon and monument are the most commonly used terms in the sign industry. <br /> noting py a �' <br /> it erson Gen ler confirmed the consensus of the Commission to use monument sign rather <br /> Chap g j <br /> than ground sign. <br /> Commissioner Hunt asked if 25 feet would be the maximum for pylon signs. <br /> i <br /> Senior Planner Martin commented that staff can review that and propose an appropriate height for <br /> the next review. <br /> 3 <br /> Commissioner Bauer recalled a time when there was strong enforcement related to temporary signs <br /> within the ri g ht-of--way, but noted that this year there appeared to be many violations. <br /> Planning Manager Larson commented that the Council direction to staff has changed to complaint <br /> based and staff has not received many complaints. <br /> Commissioner Bauer commented that the Riverstone HOA developed its own sign rules and <br /> provided input on those regulations. <br /> Senior Planner Martin commented that currently a permit is required for temporary signs,but it is <br /> rare that someone actually comes in for that permit. <br /> Commissioner Bauer referenced the time restrictions, which would allow the nonstandard <br /> temporary signs for a total of four weeks per year, but one week at a time. He stated that in the <br /> case of a new business, one week would seem a bit restrictive. <br /> Planning Manager Larson replied that restriction is for this specific type of sign, but a now open <br /> banner attached to the building would be allowed for a longer period. <br /> Commissioner Bauer stated that he would support allowing one of these more eye-catching types <br /> of signage for more than one week at a time for a new business. <br /> Chairperson Gengler asked if the one-week periods can be consecutive. <br /> Senior Planner Martin replied that his interpretation is that the one-week periods would be four <br /> separate instances. He used the example of a new car dealership that had special sales during the <br /> year and perhaps used an inflatable type of sign to catch attention during those sales. <br /> Planning Commission/November 21,2024 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />