Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I% <br /> Senior Planner Anderson stated that some regulations did exempt the buffer if the property abuts <br /> a park or a neighbor with native landscaping. He stated that he could draft some exemptions for <br /> the Board to consider and bring those back. He noted that there is not a strict timeline for this, as <br /> his goal would be to have the regulations in place prior to the next growing season. <br /> Chairperson Fetterley agreed that it would make sense to split up where buffers would be required <br /> and not required. <br /> Board Member Hagerty asked for clarification on the process moving forward. <br /> s^ <br /> Senior Planner Anderson explained that the Board will develop the standards and he will finalize <br /> the draft ordinance language,which would receive a formal recommendation from the Board. He <br /> stated that if the language stays in the nuisance chapter, it would then move to the City Council <br /> for two readings. He stated that if the information is placed in the zoning code, it would move to <br /> the Planning Commission for a public hearing before going to the City Council for two readings. <br /> The Board provided consensus direction to consider different buffer standards for rural residential <br /> p <br /> lots and MLTSA lots. It was noted that there would still be a setback requirement from the road <br /> regardless of the zoning district. s' <br /> is <br /> Board Member Salami commented that it will be important to differentiate the standards so that <br /> people on urban lots do not compare themselves to people on larger, five or ten acre lots. <br /> Board Member Bernard stated that while he would support a front setback from the road for rural <br /> lots he would not want to see side or back setbacks unless someone complains. F <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that he would be hesitant to include a complaint claim as some <br /> 3; <br /> residents just do not get along with their neighbors and that could put them in an unfair position. <br /> He stated that he will use the comments received to update the draft and bring it back for additional <br /> review by the Board. <br /> 6. BOARD 1 STAFF INPUT <br /> k". <br /> Senior Planner Anderson p <br /> provided an update on the recent Fix It Clinic held on October 5t-',which <br /> p <br /> was not as well attended as they had hoped. <br /> Chairperson Fetterley asked if the Board should discuss the 2025 meeting calendar or whether that <br /> should occur at the next meeting. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson commented that he planned to create a draft calendar for 2025 to present <br /> at the November meeting,recognizing that the January and February meetings always have to shift <br /> because of holidays. <br /> 7. ADJOURNMENT <br /> Motion by Board Member Salami and seconded by Board Member Burgess to adjourn the meeting. <br /> The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. <br /> Environmental Policy Board 1 October 21,2024 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />