Laserfiche WebLink
City Administrator Hagen shared that the City would need to receive a signed and stamped plan <br /> from a licensed architect, which they have received. He noted that both the building inspector and <br /> the fire inspector would need to look at the project. He added that they could expedite the building <br /> permit review due to the circumstances and they could get it reviewed as quickly as possible. He <br /> stated that if there are plan revisions, this would be outside of the City's control and would have <br /> to be addressed by Green Valley. <br /> A representative from Green Valley stated they believe that they meet every criteria of an <br /> agricultural building. He noted that other than making the building 14 feet longer and closing off <br /> the mezzanine, it is just a modernized version of what they already had in place. He added that <br /> they were told in January that the building met the criteria of an agricultural building. He said they <br /> have not grown the project or made it bigger since then and they have only done what they said <br /> they were going to do. He shared that they had a similar situation about a year and a half ago which <br /> resulted in a $100,000 loss. He noted that he was told that they would not need a building permit <br /> for this building. He said they feel as though they are exempt as an agricultural building and it will <br /> be used to grow and ship their plants, nothing more. <br /> Councilmember Specht noted that because Green Valley was originally told that they would not <br /> need a building permit and since the project has moved so far along, it would be unfair to change <br /> their opinion now and require it to go through the building permit process. <br /> Councilmember Howell noted that this seems to her to be an agricultural building with primarily <br /> agricultural purposes which makes this enough of a unique situation to make an exception. She <br /> said she would support this moving forward with a corporate statute. <br /> Councilmember Olson asked if they have had any inspections done at the property. <br /> A representative from Green Valley stated they have had fire and electrical inspections completed. <br /> Community Development Director Hanson noted that the Fire Department did have some <br /> corrections that need to be made to the building. <br /> A representative from Green Valley said they made these corrections. <br /> Councilmember Olson said it is best to have safety in mind and this building is essentially the same <br /> as what was there before. He said he is okay with allowing this as an exception. <br /> Mayor Kuzma asked what plan was submitted in January when they spoke with the building <br /> inspector. <br /> A representative from Green Valley explained that they just had the dimensions of the project. <br /> Planning Manager Larson shared that he was present in this meeting, and they were presented with <br /> just a rectangular building which was slightly different from what was there before. He added that <br /> while he has not been in the new building,he has seen the floor plan, and this is not a concern from <br /> the zoning perspective. He noted that what was originally presented that they were told would not <br /> City Council Work Session/December 10, 2024 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />