My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 12/10/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2024
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 12/10/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:56:45 AM
Creation date
1/16/2025 1:29:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/10/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
need a building permit was essentially the same building as what was there before. He explained <br />that in the old building when you walked in, you would see an open warehouse with pallets of <br />materials, whereas now, when you walk in you see the reception desk and offices. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked if the developer would be acceptable to go through the building permitting <br />process. <br /> <br />A representative from Green Valley said this would set a precedent for the future if they ever <br />needed to make changes, like controlling their irrigation equipment with computers. He noted that <br />the office space is essential to running their business and goes along with their agricultural use. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak noted that there is something specific in the statute that talks about locating <br />operations inside of a greenhouse itself. He shared that he hopes for any future projects there will <br />be more interaction with Staff than was had this time. He explained that with the office spaces, <br />they will likely want to have some kind of inspection process in place; however, they can make <br />the exception unique enough that someone else will not try to do the same thing in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell shared that it is very clear at this point that Staff was originally aware that <br />there would be offices in the building. She noted that Staff was originally in agreement with having <br />offices in the building when this project was brought forward in January. She said that since Staff <br />was aware of the offices, she would not want to change the process now as it would not be fair to <br />do so. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht added that the whole reason this came up is because Green Valley wanted <br />to do the right thing and have the building inspected to ensure it is safe. He noted that they are not <br />trying to cut any corners on safety. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked what parcel this building is on. <br /> <br />A representative from Green Valley shared that the property is all one parcel now and is on the <br />113 acre parcel. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hanson noted that she wished building Staff could have been <br />present this evening to help answer some questions. She added that the main difference with the <br />current building and what used to be there is that the new building is two stories, and they have <br />enclosed offices. She added that the new Building Official has set up a new process for these <br />agricultural buildings that was not in place before. She noted that this project will go through this <br />process. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to leave the building as agricultural and not require it to go <br />through the building permit process. <br /> <br />2.03: Continued review of the draft Rental Housing Licensing Inspections Policy <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / December 10, 2024 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.