Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/21/2025

Home

Parks and Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood replied that the entirety of letter D could be removed. Chairperson Musgrove referenced language related to trail bridges, expressing similar concern but stated that she would be fine leaving the language as is. She moved to funding and stated that it is a lot of information. She commented that she likes the comparison to what has been done and will need to be done. She suggested that information that would seem more specific to a case could be removed. She suggested that statement 14.03 be reviewed by staff and legal counsel. She stated that typically the Committee does not meet in December, but this could be brought back in December if desired. She noted that the other options would be for this to move forward to a Council worksession or on the regular City Council agenda. City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby commented that the policies will be reformatted to match and both policies could be ready for the December loth City Council worksession. It was confirmed that this will move forward to the December 10th City Council worksession and then onto the regular agenda as an item on consent if there are no substantiative changes. 5.02: Trail Maintenance Policy This item was discussed at part of Item 5.01 and the consensus was that this policy will move to the December 10th City Council worksession. 5.03: Consider Recommending City Council Authorization to Prepare Plans and Specifications for 2025 Pavement Maintenance Improvement Projects Assistant City Engineer Feriancek reviewed the staff report and the recommendation for City Council authorization to prepare plans and specifications for 2025 pavement maintenance improvement projects. Chairperson Musgrove commented that she recalled the budget was $750,000 whereas the proposed cost is $650,000. She asked if anything was removed from the list to result in the lesser cost. She asked if the MSA pavement marking would come from MSA funding. Assistant City Engineer Feriancek replied that there was a one-year bump to $750,000. He stated that based on the ten-year CIP and projected needs, he has reviewed what would be needed for crack seal and rejuvenation as well as pavement marking. He confirmed that a portion of the MSA funds is designated towards maintenance, therefore technically MSA funds are used but as an automatic contribution towards maintenance. He stated that the $600,000 should be sufficient and projects were not pulled from the list. Chairperson Musgrove asked for additional clarification on pothole repair. Assistant City Engineer Feriancek replied that if there are funds left over from the $600,000, those funds could be used for skim patching or other pothole repairs. He stated that staff plans to bring Public Works Committee / November 19, 2024 Page 4 of 8