Laserfiche WebLink
beyond reasonable repair.This process does not apply to commissioned works, as they would follow the <br /> artist selection guidelines; it refers only to the purchase of completed works for placement in public <br /> areas.The common practice for this component is to have the public art review authority establish <br /> guidelines for acquisition and removal, paying specific attention to cost, scale, subject matter, artistic <br /> style, ongoing maintenance cost, and general adherence to program policies. <br /> The Receipt of Public Art Gifts <br /> The receipt of public art gifts is included in eight of ten plans reviewed and is recommended to <br /> be outlined in the public art master plan. Gifts of public art are common, including famous pieces such <br /> as Detroit's Joe Louis' Fist, gifted by Sports Illustrated magazine to the City of Detroit 1987 (Nawrocki & <br /> Clements, 1999). It is logical to provide a standard process for the receipt of these gifts in the public art <br /> master plan, as it is a form of art acquisition.The common practice for this component is that gifts be <br /> reviewed and approved by the public art authority, in accordance with acquisition and removal <br /> guidelines included in the plan. <br /> Educational Opportunities <br /> Education was included in nine of ten public art master plans reviewed. Documentation was <br /> found to be a part of this component as public art documentation can serve as an educational tool in <br /> itself. Additionally, curriculum kits which correspond with local and state curriculum requirements were <br /> also developed for various educational groups in several plans. Stephens (2006) explores community- <br /> based learning and participatory public art, concluding that "placing participatory public art at the <br /> center of community-based learning helps students tap into their imaginations and turn that curiosity <br /> into useable knowledge."Additionally, 44%of the responding public art programs surveyed in 2001 <br /> stated that they provided educational opportunities, with the most common methods being open <br /> meetings and lectures on public art.The survey also showed that of public art programs that had an <br /> ordinance which provided funding, 21%allocated funding for education (Americans for the Arts, 2003). <br /> 28 <br />