Laserfiche WebLink
1.7 Methods <br /> This research project proposes a qualitative case study approach; supported by <br /> interviews, case study, document review, site visits and literature review. Three contrasting <br /> (most different) community types will be examined. It is proposed that one first-ring suburban <br /> community(Community A), one freestanding regional center (Community B) and one exurban <br /> community(Community Q be analyzed concerning public art projects in the small city context. <br /> Conclusions will be drawn in regard to the research questions by comparing and contrasting the <br /> similarities and differences of these communities. Each community has been identified as <br /> having a significant public art installation. The cities are described below: <br /> • Community A is a fully developed inner-ring suburban community of the Twin Cities <br /> with a 2010 population of 17,601. The city is a western suburb of Minneapolis and is <br /> located in Hennepin County. <br /> • Community B is a rural freestanding regional commerce center in central Minnesota. <br /> Hutchinson has a 2010 population of 14,176. The city is located approximately 60 miles <br /> west of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area(known as the Twin Cities). <br /> • Community C is an exurban community west of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan <br /> area and has a 2010 population of 5,464. The city was once a freestanding agricultural <br /> center, and is now on the fringes of the metropolitan area and within commuting distance <br /> for residents. <br /> As part of the case study, one-on-one interviews were conducted with several key people <br /> in each of the three communities. Initial interviews included the city manager, the mayor, and a <br /> community art professional involved with the project. Additional collaborators were identified <br /> through this process and subsequently interviewed. <br /> 22 <br />