My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
contradictions inherent in the term "public art"by bringing different sorts of people into <br /> contact in creative ways. Art is a potential tool for communication, and the <br /> communication can cross all sorts of boundaries. (Finkelpearl 2000, P. x) <br /> While Finkelpearl chose a definition and application of the term "public art," other <br /> authors expand the definition in order to include multiple dimensions of the term. Bruce Robbins <br /> (1993) writes in The Phantom Public Sphere, a reference of Jeff Weintraub's identification of <br /> four primary ways that public and private are opposed: first, is the distinction between the State <br /> and the private market economy; second, is the distinction of civil society and citizenship from <br /> both the State and the market economy; third, with the concept of public space as being a space <br /> of symbolic self-presentation; and fourth, the feminist distinction of private and public. <br /> In the mid-twentieth century, it was feminist scholars that challenged the prevailing <br /> norms of public and private in regard to gender, race class, and sexuality. The masculine <br /> hegemony of the day promoted the public world of work and governance, while diminishing the <br /> role of domestic and private life. Palmer(2012) notes in her writings that, "Feminist scholars see <br /> the dichotomous conceptualization as perpetuating oppressive structures of gender inequality, <br /> leaving women and other marginalized peoples, confined to the private sphere (Rose 1993; <br /> Palmer 2012, p. 24)." This classification of people, or groups of people, as public or private is an <br /> important distinction relative to the cultural privilege enjoyed by certain people, places, objects <br /> and activities. Importantly, she notes that how we use public space is not value-neutral. As a <br /> society we use public space to invoke ideals and create normative behavior, and it is through the <br /> practice of public art that we realize an expanded engagement of the world. <br /> Some authors argue that simply placing an artwork in a public space does not necessarily <br /> make it public, and it is not public art if it fails to engage the public (Heine 1996). In order to <br /> 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.