Laserfiche WebLink
pets numbers—such as dates, addresses, or legislative bills or public laws. (Rubin and Rubin <br /> 2005, p. 207) <br /> The next steps recommended in the data analysis is to examine each interview in order to <br /> clarify what is meant by specific concepts and themes and to synthesize different versions of the <br /> events to put together an understanding of the overall story. The process of clarifying and <br /> synthesizing ideas will generate new concepts and themes through a process Rubin and Rubin <br /> term elaboration. <br /> The final steps of the process involve coding, sorting, and a final synthesis of the various <br /> concepts that the researcher has developed. Coding involves the systematic labeling of concepts, <br /> themes, events, and topical markers so that the researcher can readily retrieve and examine all <br /> related data units across all interviews. Sorting involves the grouping of data units that have the <br /> same label in order to examine the concept presented, and to explore similarities and differences <br /> between groups of interview participants in regard to the same concept, theme, or event. The <br /> final synthesis involves combining concepts to describe the apparent operation of the culture <br /> (E.g., the role of the public administrator in cross sector public art collaborations). This last <br /> phase of analysis includes a description of events that occurred and allowed the researcher to <br /> suggest how and why projects may have succeeded or failed. <br /> 3.12 Limitations <br /> The scope of this study is limited to conclusions drawn from three contemporary(i.e., <br /> within the last 20 years) cases of public art collaboration by examining and describing the <br /> community experiences and the role of the public administrator in this process. To that extent, <br /> 81 <br />