Laserfiche WebLink
about some of the artwork in the past. Her view was that people should react to public art and <br /> that even though the reaction was negative, she saw it positive that at least people were talking <br /> about it. Some of the public art has engaged the community by asking students and artists to <br /> contribute to the work. One piece incorporated historic artifacts contributed by members of the <br /> community. The downtown decoration of utility boxes with public art provided "something <br /> positive" for people to look at, and gave local artists a chance to display their work. The public <br /> art is being used by educational institutions to get students outdoors and to teach them something <br /> about the city. She believes that the community as a whole benefit from public art, that the local <br /> art council benefits, and that local businesses benefit by the increased number of people coming <br /> to the community. Local community groups also benefit by sponsoring projects that help <br /> promote their groups. She sees the public cost to include maintenance of the pieces, including <br /> repair from vandalism and other damage. <br /> 4.5 Summary and Findings: Community Benefits and Costs of Public Art <br /> The chart below brings together phases used by each of the respondents related to the <br /> benefits and costs of public, grouped by community. Together, these comments help paint the <br /> picture of what art collaborators think are the key benefits and costs of public art in each <br /> respective community. <br /> Table 1: Phrases Describing Community Benefits and Costs <br /> Phrases used to describe benefits Phrases used to describe <br /> costs <br /> Community A shapes the community/makes city more taxes/long-term <br /> interesting/creates a destination/economic main tenance%emoval/ <br /> development tool/desirable image/draws people/ controversy/minimal/ <br /> very strong impact/economic impact/return on <br /> 110 <br />