My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Follow-up: Can you provide examples of how public art contributes to the city of <br /> (state name of city)? <br /> What do you think is the strongest rationale for public art in (state name of city)? <br /> Is public art mostly for residents or visitors? <br /> Follow-up: How do you think public art is perceived by people who live or visit <br /> (state name of city)? <br /> Probe: Is there an awareness of public art in the community? <br /> What do you see as the public benefits of public art? <br /> Follow-up: Has your community achieved such benefit? <br /> Who benefits from public art? <br /> Probe: community, civic, and social groups, business groups, artist/art groups, etc. <br /> Do you think there are some people/groups that should also benefit, but presently do not? <br /> Are there public costs (either monetary or non-monetary) of public art in the community? <br /> Follow-up: If so, how would you describe those costs? <br /> Given our discussion so far, what do you consider to be an example of a successful public art <br /> project in the community? <br /> Follow-up: What are the criteria for public art being successful? <br /> Probe: Is the success of this project based upon the piece, the process, or the site? <br /> Probe: What was the most important thing that made this project successful? <br /> Given our discussion so far, what do you consider to be an example of an unsuccessful public art <br /> project in the community? <br /> Follow-up: What are the criteria for public art being successful? <br /> Probe: Is the lack of success of this project based upon the piece, the process, or the site? <br /> Probe: What was the most citical thing that made this project unsuccessful? <br /> Based upon your perspective (as public administrator, elected official, collaborator), do you see <br /> public art as a high or low priority? (Scale of 1-10) <br /> Low Priority 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 High Priority <br /> SECTION 3: Cross sector collaboration and interactions and the role of the public <br /> administrator <br /> The next set of questions is about the role of the public administrator in the public art process. I <br /> want to get a sense of the types and extent of actions among project collaborators: public, <br /> private, or institutional. <br /> 154 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.